| Help related to extending behavior of Project Explorer tree [message #246496] |
Wed, 23 January 2008 08:17  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
I am interested in extending the Project Explorer tree. What I intend to do
is that under a folder (sitting under some project), I want to populate a
tree (either dummy/virtual or a reference/linked resource) on basis of the
actual tree existing on the file system. In the process I want to be able to
detect clicks or actions on items in this tree and also be able to suppress
some of the native Eclipse actions (via the right-click, etc.). Also, I
would like this tree to be in sync with the file system in a manner by which
any changes made to its contents on the file system be reflected on my tree
as well.
I would be most grateful if you could guide me to where I could find
specific information for the same. I am using Europa and hence any material
related to extending functionality for the above here would be great!!
Thanks,
Rahul
|
|
|
| Re: Help related to extending behavior of Project Explorer tree [message #246550 is a reply to message #246496] |
Wed, 23 January 2008 12:24  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Rahul,
This was answered in the platform newsgroup.
Rahul Kamdar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in extending the Project Explorer tree. What I intend to do
> is that under a folder (sitting under some project), I want to populate a
> tree (either dummy/virtual or a reference/linked resource) on basis of the
> actual tree existing on the file system. In the process I want to be able to
> detect clicks or actions on items in this tree and also be able to suppress
> some of the native Eclipse actions (via the right-click, etc.). Also, I
> would like this tree to be in sync with the file system in a manner by which
> any changes made to its contents on the file system be reflected on my tree
> as well.
>
> I would be most grateful if you could guide me to where I could find
> specific information for the same. I am using Europa and hence any material
> related to extending functionality for the above here would be great!!
>
> Thanks,
> Rahul
>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.07717 seconds
Home