| Lazy Dataloading and Obfuscating [message #2090] |
Tue, 09 January 2007 08:38  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello,
we are planning to develop an webclient with ajax technology. At the
moment we are testing three frameworks. RAP is one of these frameworks.
So i have some little questions:
Is there a lazy data loading possible for tables and trees possible? Our
goal is that webclient is not much slower than the current smart client.
Is there a limit for max number of rows in tables or objects in trees? I
changed the rap demo to put 10.000 rows in the table. The result was
that Firefox is crashed (it seems that is a Firefox problem, IE 7 works).
Can we use a obfuscator like retroguard?
Kind regards,
Stefan Biermann
|
|
|
| Re: Lazy Dataloading and Obfuscating [message #2105 is a reply to message #2090] |
Thu, 11 January 2007 03:59  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Stafan,
please see my comments below
HTH
Rüdiger Herrmann
Stefan Biermann wrote:
> Hello,
> we are planning to develop an webclient with ajax technology. At the
> moment we are testing three frameworks. RAP is one of these frameworks.
> So i have some little questions:
>
> Is there a lazy data loading possible for tables and trees possible? Our
> goal is that webclient is not much slower than the current smart client.
RAP will provide a JFace analogon, and JFace itslef provides lazy
loading for trees and tables. But as of now there is no ready-to-use
implementation.
For the trees You could easily implement lazy loading yourself. Just
place a dummy node as a child for each 'lazy' node and replace it with
the actual nodes when expanded.
>
> Is there a limit for max number of rows in tables or objects in trees? I
> changed the rap demo to put 10.000 rows in the table. The result was
> that Firefox is crashed (it seems that is a Firefox problem, IE 7 works).
Looks like that there is a limit. RAP does not put a limit, but if any
browser cannot cope with the load, then that will be the limit.
I will forward this to the qooxdoo - the JavaScript library RAP uses
client side - newsgroup, maybe they have some insight.
IMHO presenting 10,000 rows to the end user isn't a good choice anyway.
Imagine that after waiting that long as it takes to transfer all the
data You are overwhelmed with such pile of information.
>
> Can we use a obfuscator like retroguard?
In general yes, but I have no idea if it *really* works. You could
obfuscate the demo and see what happens to get some insight into this.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Stefan Biermann
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02818 seconds
Home