| CVS vs Subversion [message #196502] |
Tue, 22 February 2005 16:50  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: reh.tradingmetrics.com
Small distributed team considering buying config management services
from a provider. They offer CVS and Subversion, but recommend the
latter.
So: Any horror stories with Subversion? Looking at its 'known
issues' list there appear to be a few potential gotchas.
|
|
|
|
| Re: CVS vs Subversion [message #196587 is a reply to message #196502] |
Wed, 23 February 2005 06:45  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: alex.corcoles.NOSPAMlaureate-inc.com
Last time I looked, Subversion support in Eclipse was not as nice as
CVS and that's been a factor for not migrating to SVN at work.
In any case, I've used CVS at work and I've learned to live with its
problems. I have only used Subversion at home (i.e. not using it for
team development, nor heavy duty branching), and it seems much nicer
than CVS, but I've heard some problems about Subversion's db backend
(corruptions, mostly), but if you back up regularly, that shouldn't be
a problem; or you could look into it's fs backend.
Richard Huddleston wrote:
> Small distributed team considering buying config management services
> from a provider. They offer CVS and Subversion, but recommend the
> latter.
>
> So: Any horror stories with Subversion? Looking at its 'known
> issues' list there appear to be a few potential gotchas.
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03253 seconds
Home