Home » Language IDEs » C / C++ IDE (CDT) » Announcing - "CDT for Windows"
| Announcing - "CDT for Windows" [message #194501] |
Fri, 29 June 2007 09:48  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dschaefer.qnx.com
Over a couple of days this last week while I was waiting for Europa to
close, I finally took the time to put together the CDT/MinGW
distribution I keep talking about. This is a distribution of Eclipse
3.3, CDT 4.0, the MinGW toolchain and a few libraries along with a Java
Runtime wrapped up in a nice Windows installer. This should make it
easier for people to get started with the CDT on their Windows machines.
It’s out at SourceForge. I have more information in my blog entry at
http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com/2007/06/introducing-cdt-for-wind ows.html.
It’s still in Beta at version 0.9.1. feel free to pass any ideas on how
to improve it to the SourceForge site:
http://cdt-windows.sourceforge.net.
Cheers,
Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
|
|
| | |
| Re: Announcing - "CDT for Windows" [message #196111 is a reply to message #195760] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 14:05  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dschaefer.qnx.com
Mike Jackson wrote:
> On 2007-06-29 09:48:49 -0400, Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@qnx.com> said:
>
>> Over a couple of days this last week while I was waiting for Europa to
>> close, I finally took the time to put together the CDT/MinGW
>> distribution I keep talking about. This is a distribution of Eclipse
>> 3.3, CDT 4.0, the MinGW toolchain and a few libraries along with a
>> Java Runtime wrapped up in a nice Windows installer. This should make
>> it easier for people to get started with the CDT on their Windows
>> machines.
>>
>> It’s out at SourceForge. I have more information in my blog entry at
>>
>> http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com/2007/06/introducing-cdt-for-wind ows.html.
>>
>> It’s still in Beta at version 0.9.1. feel free to pass any ideas on
>> how to improve it to the SourceForge site:
>>
>> http://cdt-windows.sourceforge.net.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
>> Eclipse CDT Project Lead, http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com
>
> I just tried out this distribution for windows and generally liked it
> but one omission that _should_ be in the package (IMO) is the CVS
> integration one would normally find in Eclipse. I was easily enough able
> to find it using the Software updates, but it would be nice if it was
> already included in the distribution.
>
> Thanks
> Mike Jackson
>
To be honest, I was surprised it wasn't there. As of Eclipse 3.3, the
CVS support is not part of the Eclipse platform. I'll definitely
consider adding it, and maybe one of the Subversion clients as well.
Thanks,
Doug
|
|
| | |
| Re: Announcing - "CDT for Windows" [message #196394 is a reply to message #196353] |
Wed, 11 July 2007 12:31 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: paul.mcconkey.net
The whole Subclipse/Subversive thing is unfortunate and I suspect that
choosing one will never satisfy more than 50% of users (I use Subclipse).
As Subversive is the 'official' client, I suggest that this is the one that
is included, if you _have_ to include one. This could have the side effect
of making Subversive the de-facto Subversion client for CDT users, which may
be a good thing if Polarion are able to properly progress the project.
However, it may be better to leave the Subversion client out altogether,
because I suspect that it may be difficult to replace Subversive with
Subclipse if you are so inclined. After all, installing either client is
really very straightforward.
Cheers,
Paul.
"Doug Schaefer" <dschaefer@qnx.com> wrote in message
news:f72qom$ddl$2@build.eclipse.org...
> Mikhail Barg wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> Doug Schaefer wrote:
>>> To be honest, I was surprised it wasn't there. As of Eclipse 3.3, the
>>> CVS support is not part of the Eclipse platform. I'll definitely
>>> consider adding it, and maybe one of the Subversion clients as well.
>>
>> Well, adding Subversion support would be really great!
>>
>
> The question I have is which client? Subclipse or Subversive. Subclipse
> has been around longer, but Subversive is trying to become an official
> Eclipse project. I've tried both and neither make me very happy. Which one
> do you guys prefer?
>
> Doug.
|
|
| |
| Re: Announcing - "CDT for Windows" [message #196776 is a reply to message #196394] |
Thu, 12 July 2007 21:24 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: dschaefer.qnx.com
I think I want wait and see what happens with Subversive. If they ever
get their bits onto Eclipse.org, that would be the way to go. But I've
lost confidence in them for the moment.
Doug
Paul McConkey wrote:
> The whole Subclipse/Subversive thing is unfortunate and I suspect that
> choosing one will never satisfy more than 50% of users (I use Subclipse).
>
> As Subversive is the 'official' client, I suggest that this is the one that
> is included, if you _have_ to include one. This could have the side effect
> of making Subversive the de-facto Subversion client for CDT users, which may
> be a good thing if Polarion are able to properly progress the project.
>
> However, it may be better to leave the Subversion client out altogether,
> because I suspect that it may be difficult to replace Subversive with
> Subclipse if you are so inclined. After all, installing either client is
> really very straightforward.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.
>
> "Doug Schaefer" <dschaefer@qnx.com> wrote in message
> news:f72qom$ddl$2@build.eclipse.org...
>> Mikhail Barg wrote:
>>> Hi Doug,
>>>
>>> Doug Schaefer wrote:
>>>> To be honest, I was surprised it wasn't there. As of Eclipse 3.3, the
>>>> CVS support is not part of the Eclipse platform. I'll definitely
>>>> consider adding it, and maybe one of the Subversion clients as well.
>>> Well, adding Subversion support would be really great!
>>>
>> The question I have is which client? Subclipse or Subversive. Subclipse
>> has been around longer, but Subversive is trying to become an official
>> Eclipse project. I've tried both and neither make me very happy. Which one
>> do you guys prefer?
>>
>> Doug.
>
>
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Jul 23 16:11:37 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06036 seconds |
Home