| Cheetah features and schedule [message #163080] |
Mon, 07 June 2004 13:57  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Is there any schedule for Cheetah? In particular, will support for
enumerations,
autoboxing, and static imports be coming soon? In case anyone cares,
enumerations
are definitely my highest priority. Thanks.
Steve Buroff
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Cheetah features and schedule [message #163420 is a reply to message #163381] |
Wed, 09 June 2004 10:13  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Apparently Cheetah is not considered a very high priority. This is rather
disappointing. Not even having a schedule means that we can't even plan
ahead. You have a very detailed schedule for 3.0, why not for Cheetah?
Many people have requested one. My guess is that a schedule would be a
committment and I guess you don't want to commit to supporting 1.5.
I think I'll give NetBeans a try.
Steve
"Philippe Mulet" <philippe_mulet@fr.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:ca6rfj$urv$1@eclipse.org...
> We don't have a formalized schedule for Cheetah deliveries.
> A fair answer is *after* we ship 3.0 <g>. We will still try to post a
better
> patch before end of June,
> but it will not support enumerations by then. Currently, the area of
> improvements are around leveraging some of the generics in the JavaModel
> (which is the corner stone for all the IDE Java tools... outliner, errors
in
> editor, etc...).
>
> "Lynn Orrell" <Lynn.Orrell@wiltel.com> wrote in message
> news:ca5o95$qtg$1@eclipse.org...
> > I too would love to see the release schedule (if any) for Cheetah...
> >
> >
> > "Steven Buroff" <sburoff@optonline.net> wrote in message
> > news:ca29r2$dta$1@eclipse.org...
> > > Is there any schedule for Cheetah? In particular, will support for
> > > enumerations,
> > > autoboxing, and static imports be coming soon? In case anyone cares,
> > > enumerations
> > > are definitely my highest priority. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Steve Buroff
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Cheetah features and schedule [message #163427 is a reply to message #163420] |
Wed, 09 June 2004 10:16 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Then why do you think we bother working on this preview ?
Yes we want to deliver 1.5, but we want to deliver one thing at a time.
Don't ask for a schedule for Eclipse R3.1 until R3.0 is done.
"Steven Buroff" <sburoff@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:ca75eg$c3f$1@eclipse.org...
> Apparently Cheetah is not considered a very high priority. This is rather
> disappointing. Not even having a schedule means that we can't even plan
> ahead. You have a very detailed schedule for 3.0, why not for Cheetah?
> Many people have requested one. My guess is that a schedule would be a
> committment and I guess you don't want to commit to supporting 1.5.
> I think I'll give NetBeans a try.
>
> Steve
>
>
> "Philippe Mulet" <philippe_mulet@fr.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:ca6rfj$urv$1@eclipse.org...
> > We don't have a formalized schedule for Cheetah deliveries.
> > A fair answer is *after* we ship 3.0 <g>. We will still try to post a
> better
> > patch before end of June,
> > but it will not support enumerations by then. Currently, the area of
> > improvements are around leveraging some of the generics in the JavaModel
> > (which is the corner stone for all the IDE Java tools... outliner,
errors
> in
> > editor, etc...).
> >
> > "Lynn Orrell" <Lynn.Orrell@wiltel.com> wrote in message
> > news:ca5o95$qtg$1@eclipse.org...
> > > I too would love to see the release schedule (if any) for Cheetah...
> > >
> > >
> > > "Steven Buroff" <sburoff@optonline.net> wrote in message
> > > news:ca29r2$dta$1@eclipse.org...
> > > > Is there any schedule for Cheetah? In particular, will support for
> > > > enumerations,
> > > > autoboxing, and static imports be coming soon? In case anyone cares,
> > > > enumerations
> > > > are definitely my highest priority. Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Steve Buroff
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03993 seconds
Home