| 
| Beginner question .. [message #14181] | Thu, 01 June 2006 23:33  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Originally posted by: subhashgo.gmail.com 
 I am just starting on VoiceXML and VTP and have this basic question. Is
 it always required to use an online browser to interpret the VopiceXML
 file? (I don't have a public server to upload the file, and that's a
 problem). Aren't there standalone interpreters for VoiceXML that can be
 downloaded and run on the local machine? Something that also provides
 Java APIs would be just what I have been looking for.
 
 I apologize if this is a silly starter question, but I did google around
 a bit and didn't find any relevant information. It would be great if you
 folks could help
 
 TIA,
 Subhash
 |  |  |  | 
| 
| Re: Beginner question .. [message #14198 is a reply to message #14181] | Fri, 02 June 2006 10:11  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Originally posted by: bdmetz.us.ibm.com.spam 
 There are, but the VTP currently does not ship with any integrated so you
 will have to run them separately. A few ones off the top of my head are are:
 
 - JVoiceXML, which uses entirely open source components:
 http://jvoicexml.sourceforge.net/
 - Voxeo Prophecy, which is free for 2 ports: http://www.voxeo.com/prophecy/
 - And of course, I have to list my employer's offering: IBM WebSphere Voice
 Toolkit, which requires IBM's Rational Application Developer to use:
 http://www-306.ibm.com/software/pervasive/voice_toolkit/
 
 JVoiceXML has Java APIs and I would suggest you start there. Prophecy might
 have some sort of java access via the <object> tag, which I must note is a
 proprietary customization that some browsers may offer.
 
 "Subhash Gopalakrishnan" <subhashgo@gmail.com> wrote in message
 news:e5obj3$p82$1@utils.eclipse.org...
 >I am just starting on VoiceXML and VTP and have this basic question. Is it
 >always required to use an online browser to interpret the VopiceXML file?
 >(I don't have a public server to upload the file, and that's a problem).
 >Aren't there standalone interpreters for VoiceXML that can be downloaded
 >and run on the local machine? Something that also provides Java APIs would
 >be just what I have been looking for.
 >
 > I apologize if this is a silly starter question, but I did google around a
 > bit and didn't find any relevant information. It would be great if you
 > folks could help
 >
 > TIA,
 > Subhash
 |  |  |  | 
| 
| Re: Beginner question .. [message #574910 is a reply to message #14181] | Fri, 02 June 2006 10:11  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Originally posted by: bdmetz.us.ibm.com.spam 
 There are, but the VTP currently does not ship with any integrated so you
 will have to run them separately. A few ones off the top of my head are are:
 
 - JVoiceXML, which uses entirely open source components:
 http://jvoicexml.sourceforge.net/
 - Voxeo Prophecy, which is free for 2 ports: http://www.voxeo.com/prophecy/
 - And of course, I have to list my employer's offering: IBM WebSphere Voice
 Toolkit, which requires IBM's Rational Application Developer to use:
 http://www-306.ibm.com/software/pervasive/voice_toolkit/
 
 JVoiceXML has Java APIs and I would suggest you start there. Prophecy might
 have some sort of java access via the <object> tag, which I must note is a
 proprietary customization that some browsers may offer.
 
 "Subhash Gopalakrishnan" <subhashgo@gmail.com> wrote in message
 news:e5obj3$p82$1@utils.eclipse.org...
 >I am just starting on VoiceXML and VTP and have this basic question. Is it
 >always required to use an online browser to interpret the VopiceXML file?
 >(I don't have a public server to upload the file, and that's a problem).
 >Aren't there standalone interpreters for VoiceXML that can be downloaded
 >and run on the local machine? Something that also provides Java APIs would
 >be just what I have been looking for.
 >
 > I apologize if this is a silly starter question, but I did google around a
 > bit and didn't find any relevant information. It would be great if you
 > folks could help
 >
 > TIA,
 > Subhash
 |  |  |  | 
Powered by 
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04048 seconds