Home » Newcomers » Newcomers » Installed the standard version of eclipse, Do I have to install jre else?(standard, jre,)
| |
| Re: Installed the standard version of eclipse, Do I have to install jre else? [message #1128300 is a reply to message #1128103] |
Mon, 07 October 2013 10:55   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Ed Merks wrote on Mon, 07 October 2013 06:40You need a JRE to run Eclipse itself. Can you run your installation
yet; if not, see the stick post for this forum.
On 07/10/2013 12:31 PM, Zhg Mising name wrote:
> I have installed the standard version of eclipse, Do I have to install
> jre else for developing java?
> or say, does standard version involve jre?
> or can standard version do all what jre can do ?
In the past I used it with jre, but now I nearly forget them all. all is stating from beginning.
at my new machine, I haven't yet installed jre, but it seems no problem to vist java pages and files.
why?
|
|
|
| Re: Installed the standard version of eclipse, Do I have to install jre else? [message #1128316 is a reply to message #1128300] |
Mon, 07 October 2013 11:10 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
If Eclipse starts, there's definitely a JRE installed and available.
Within the IDE itself you might want to use a specific one which you'd
configure in your Java -> Installed JREs preference.
On 07/10/2013 4:55 PM, Zhg Mising name wrote:
> Ed Merks wrote on Mon, 07 October 2013 06:40
>> You need a JRE to run Eclipse itself. Can you run your installation
>> yet; if not, see the stick post for this forum.
>>
>>
>> On 07/10/2013 12:31 PM, Zhg Mising name wrote:
>> > I have installed the standard version of eclipse, Do I have to
>> install > jre else for developing java?
>> > or say, does standard version involve jre?
>> > or can standard version do all what jre can do ?
>
> In the past I used it with jre, but now I nearly forget them all. all
> is stating from beginning.
>
> at my new machine, I haven't yet installed jre, but it seems no
> problem to vist java pages and files.
> why?
>
|
|
| | | |
| Re: Installed the standard version of eclipse, Do I have to install jre else? [message #1129100 is a reply to message #1128378] |
Tue, 08 October 2013 05:33 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I can't parse statements nor your questions... In any case, you need at
JRE to run Eclipse itself, you also need a JRE if you're going to use
Eclipse to develop Java applications (it could be a different one), and
no package comes with a JRE so you have to just get that yourself.
On 07/10/2013 6:21 PM, Zhg Mising name wrote:
> Ed Merks wrote on Mon, 07 October 2013 11:34
>> Comments below.
>>
>> On 07/10/2013 5:26 PM, Zhg Mising name wrote:
>> > as the file does not install,
>> What file?
>> > just extend to a certain fold.
>> I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
>> > so I han't yet found any problem.
>> Sounds fine then.
>> > but when run it, it shows that the jre is lack.
>> How does it show that?
>> > or need jdk.
>> I find that I always want to configure a JDK with source so I can
>> debug into the JRE code easily.
>> > now the question is why the standard version does not include jdk?
>> Because the JDKs are licensed by their providers with their own
>> specific rules about how they are distributed. So you'll have to get
>> one from an appropriate source and use it.
>
> the elipse does not need install like other software did, just depress
> to some folder.
>
> it shows need jre or jdk.
> does ide for java develper include jdk?
>
> or do I have to install ide for java developer without standard version?
|
|
| | | | |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Jul 28 10:33:00 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.09991 seconds |
Home