| installing PDT [message #28385] |
Thu, 14 June 2007 13:26  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: pobox.verysmall.org
Could somebody point to me an good resource about installing PDT. I use
Eclipse with PDT for several months now and the installation is always
pain. Currently I am stuck with PDT wanting org.eclipse.wst (2.0.0) and
the updater has access to WST 1.5.4 only. As far as I saw WST 2 is in
RC2 state. It's kind of inconvenient.
Thanks,
Iavor
|
|
|
|
| Re: installing PDT [message #29992 is a reply to message #28385] |
Sun, 17 June 2007 16:50  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: omry.yadan.net
try this (worked for me today on eclipse 3.2):
1. add PDT update site.
2. in the software manager select PDT and Calisto discovery.
3. when you get the list of packages, select only PDT (not the SDK).
4. click on "select required", Eclipse should add EMF and its dependencies.
5. install.
Iavor Raytchev wrote:
> Could somebody point to me an good resource about installing PDT. I use
> Eclipse with PDT for several months now and the installation is always
> pain. Currently I am stuck with PDT wanting org.eclipse.wst (2.0.0) and
> the updater has access to WST 1.5.4 only. As far as I saw WST 2 is in
> RC2 state. It's kind of inconvenient.
>
> Thanks,
> Iavor
|
|
|
| Re: installing PDT [message #30781 is a reply to message #29977] |
Fri, 22 June 2007 12:14 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: pobox.verysmall.org
Michael Spector wrote:
> Latest PDT milestone package
> ( http://download.eclipse.org/tools/pdt/downloads/?release=S20 070611-M1)
> depends on Eclipse 3.3 and WST 2,
> which are not released yet. Try downloading the "PDT all in one" package.
Yes. This exactly confused me - that the the PDT passed to the Updater
depends on things that are not accessible by the Updater. Isn't this
kind of bad practice?
Thanks, however, for the tip. This saves really a lot of time.
Iv
|
|
|
|
| Re: installing PDT [message #36453 is a reply to message #32860] |
Tue, 17 July 2007 14:21 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: pobox.verysmall.org
Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> PDT depends also on JEM (the visual editor, isn't it?) which is not
> available from the europa update site, is it right?
With Europa it was very easy to install PDT - everything is there. The
only problem is that before you press the button to select the required
packages - you must open the Europa tree. Otherwise it does not work.
Let me know if you have difficulties.
|
|
|
|
| Re: installing PDT [message #38020 is a reply to message #30781] |
Sun, 22 July 2007 12:06 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: slydder.arcor.de
I just gave up on updating the original eclipse I had installed (deb
package installed with apt-get in etch). No matter what I did I couldn't
get wst installed. Kept wanting things like xerces which is phased out
anyway so I deinstalled and installed the all in one package. Just now
got it running. Was hanging on the splash screen and wouldn't start. No
error messages at all just hangs. Now, all of a sudden, it works. Really
strange this package.
chuck
Iavor Raytchev wrote:
> Michael Spector wrote:
>> Latest PDT milestone package
>> ( http://download.eclipse.org/tools/pdt/downloads/?release=S20 070611-M1)
>> depends on Eclipse 3.3 and WST 2,
>> which are not released yet. Try downloading the "PDT all in one" package.
>
> Yes. This exactly confused me - that the the PDT passed to the Updater
> depends on things that are not accessible by the Updater. Isn't this
> kind of bad practice?
>
> Thanks, however, for the tip. This saves really a lot of time.
>
> Iv
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06508 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
