Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Modeling » EMF » EMap performance compared to HashMap?
EMap performance compared to HashMap? [message #1531752] Sat, 27 December 2014 11:29 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Hi,
does anyone know how the performance of a BasicEMap compares to a HashMap? I mean mainly the speed of get()-operation?

Thanks

Joel
Re: EMap performance compared to HashMap? [message #1534867 is a reply to message #1531752] Mon, 29 December 2014 05:48 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Joel,

I've not done a details analysis but they should be quite comparable.
I'm sure HashMap has seen more performance tuning that has gone into
BasicEMap, e.g., better collision handling. In any case, it's hard to
imagine that the performance difference would become a significant
performance concern in a larger application.


On 27/12/2014 5:29 PM, Joel Greenyer wrote:
> Hi,
> does anyone know how the performance of a BasicEMap compares to a
> HashMap? I mean mainly the speed of get()-operation?
>
> Thanks
>
> Joel
Previous Topic:XCore Annotation Support
Next Topic:Is there a known vulnerability with concurrent calls to ResourceSetImpl.add(Resource)?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Aug 30 18:01:13 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02911 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top