ve 1.0.0 and setting up for development [message #26025] |
Tue, 16 March 2004 14:29  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi all,
I followed Dave Orme's excellent blog at
http://www.coconut-palm-software.com/the_visual_editor/
for setting up VE 1.0.0 with Eclipse 3.0 for development off the head.
However after checking out the module ve-dev-base, and then trying to
rebuild all, I'm encountering dependency problems in
org.eclipse.jem.internal.core/JEMPlugin.java/ Basically it cannon
resolve anything in com.ibm.wtp.* It is basically trying to import
import com.ibm.wtp.common.logger.proxy.Logger;
import com.ibm.wtp.logger.proxyrender.EclipseLogger;
I did import it in File->Import->External Plugins and Fragments and it
(and the other dependent projects are) in the workspace, so I'm puzzled.
I'm probably something simple - anyone else encounter similar issues?
I'm using Eclipse M7 too, instead of M5; I'm not sure how that would
effect the issue, but I'm open to ideas.
phil
|
|
|
|
Re: ve 1.0.0 and setting up for development [message #26605 is a reply to message #26108] |
Thu, 18 March 2004 17:01  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: ""pmuldoon\".nospam.redhat (at) com"
Hi Rich
The JEM dependecies were fixed by moving to a a newer integreation
build. That integration build had errors in org.eclipse.ve.swt, so that
threw me too. But you can run without the swt package. Anyway, thanks
for having a stab at it ;)
For Newsgroup archiving, with Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS, the
following worked for me
eclipse-SDK-I20040310-linux-gtk.zip
GEF-SDK-I20040311.zip
emf-runtime-I200403081633.zip
emf-source-I200403081633.zip
VE-SDK-I20040311a.zip
regards
phil
Rich Kulp wrote:
> PDE sometimes get's confused. You did import these before downloading
> from CVS, right? We've had problems when they were done in the reverse
> order.
>
> One other possibility is you don't have the latest binaries for the
> com.ibm.wtp plugins. Over the last three weeks these have been
> restructured a couple of times as we try get them in sync with an
> inhouse user of these same plugins. Try getting the latest integration
> build and get the com.ibm.wtp plugins and features out of there.
>
> Phil Muldoon wrote:
>
|
|
|
Re: ve 1.0.0 and setting up for development [message #584707 is a reply to message #26025] |
Tue, 16 March 2004 18:07  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richkulp.NO.SPAM.us.ibm.com
PDE sometimes get's confused. You did import these before downloading
from CVS, right? We've had problems when they were done in the reverse
order.
One other possibility is you don't have the latest binaries for the
com.ibm.wtp plugins. Over the last three weeks these have been
restructured a couple of times as we try get them in sync with an
inhouse user of these same plugins. Try getting the latest integration
build and get the com.ibm.wtp plugins and features out of there.
Phil Muldoon wrote:
--
Thanks, Rich Kulp
|
|
|
Re: ve 1.0.0 and setting up for development [message #584832 is a reply to message #26108] |
Thu, 18 March 2004 17:01  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: ""pmuldoon\".nospam.redhat (at) com"
Hi Rich
The JEM dependecies were fixed by moving to a a newer integreation
build. That integration build had errors in org.eclipse.ve.swt, so that
threw me too. But you can run without the swt package. Anyway, thanks
for having a stab at it ;)
For Newsgroup archiving, with Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS, the
following worked for me
eclipse-SDK-I20040310-linux-gtk.zip
GEF-SDK-I20040311.zip
emf-runtime-I200403081633.zip
emf-source-I200403081633.zip
VE-SDK-I20040311a.zip
regards
phil
Rich Kulp wrote:
> PDE sometimes get's confused. You did import these before downloading
> from CVS, right? We've had problems when they were done in the reverse
> order.
>
> One other possibility is you don't have the latest binaries for the
> com.ibm.wtp plugins. Over the last three weeks these have been
> restructured a couple of times as we try get them in sync with an
> inhouse user of these same plugins. Try getting the latest integration
> build and get the com.ibm.wtp plugins and features out of there.
>
> Phil Muldoon wrote:
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.11217 seconds