Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » EMF » [CDO] Why we abandoned CDO
[CDO] Why we abandoned CDO [message #1439766] Tue, 07 October 2014 13:43
David Wynter is currently offline David WynterFriend
Messages: 4624
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi,

We have struggled with corruption issues with CDO repositories and determined that there is no longer available access to experts in CDO able to discover the cause of the problems.

See here https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/m/1413455/#msg_1413455
and here https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/m/1413455/#msg_1413455 and here
https://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/m/1404034/#msg_1404034

Eike seems to be the only one with sufficient expertice in CDO to solve these problems, which he suggested were to do with some subtle multi threading problem. Our test cases pass, it is only at random the corruption of the repository occurs. Eike now seems unavailable to have a look at these problems. Once the repositories are corrupt it is easy to see the corruption. We modified the CDO code to at least extract the content to xmi files. I offered to pay for Eike to look at our repositories to determine if we can recover hundreds of hours of work, but he seems unavailable for even that. No one else on the forum responds to the open questions.

These are the things to consider if adopting CDO. Others have had no issues, but ours are plain to see. We are implementing EMFStore because it is backed by a large corporation and has an active forum and commit record in recent times, CDO has neither.
Previous Topic:How to load EClasses of a certain subtype
Next Topic:Re: EMF : Code generation from ecore and genmodel
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Oct 22 05:52:56 GMT 2019

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02134 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top