Eclipse Community Forums: Eclipse Scout » Fine grained permissions

Help

Home

Home » Eclipse Projects » Eclipse Scout » Fine grained permissions(execCheckLevel is never called)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Fine grained permissions [message #1430324]

Wed, 24 September 2014 08:51

Bertin Kiekebosch

Messages: 330
Registered: August 2011

Senior Member

Hi,

I am trying to change a permission into a fine grained permission but whatever I do the method execCheckLevel(int userLevel) never gets called. (A breakpoint in the constructor works fine)

I did put some breakpoints into the implies(Permission p) method of BasicHierarchiePermissions but that also never gets called.

any Idea where this might go wrong (Scout Kepler SR2)

Regards Bertin

public class MedewerkerBewerkenPermission extends BasicHierarchyPermission {

  /**
   * @param name
   */

  private static final long serialVersionUID = 0L;
  public static final int LEVEL_OWN = 50;

  private Long m_medewerkerNr;

  public MedewerkerBewerkenPermission(Long medewerkerNr) {
    super("MedewerkerBewerkenPermission" + "." + medewerkerNr, LEVEL_UNDEFINED);
    m_medewerkerNr = medewerkerNr;
  }

  @Override
  protected boolean execCheckLevel(int userLevel) throws ProcessingException {
    if (SERVICES.getService(IMedewerkerService.class).isEigenMedewerkerRecord(getMedewerkerNr())) {
      return true;
    }
    else {
      return ACCESS.check(new VestigingshoofdPermission());
    }
  }

  public Long getMedewerkerNr() {
    return m_medewerkerNr;
  }
}

Report message to a moderator

Re: Fine grained permissions [message #1430386 is a reply to message #1430324]

Wed, 24 September 2014 10:18

Bertin Kiekebosch

Messages: 330
Registered: August 2011

Senior Member

Hi,

have it working although on the wiki the example supposes you have to add a contructor like this:

  public ReadCompanyPermission(Long companyId) {
    super("ReadCompany" + "." + companyId, LEVEL_UNDEFINED);
    m_companyId = companyId;
  }

so my constructor was like this:

public MedewerkerBewerkenPermission(Long medewerkerNr) {
    super("MedewerkerBewerkenPermission" + "." + medewerkerNr, LEVEL_UNDEFINED);
    m_medewerkerNr = medewerkerNr;
  }

but it does not work then. If I change this to:

public MedewerkerBewerkenPermission(Long medewerkerNr) {
    super("MedewerkerBewerkenPermission", LEVEL_UNDEFINED);
    m_medewerkerNr = medewerkerNr;
  }

it is working So leaving out the part + "." + medewerkerNr then it works. Is this the way it should work and is the example on the wiki misleading or did I make a mistake elsewhere?

Regards Bertin

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	AbstractTextField and ITextField
Next Topic:	Server side mapping of validations coming from a backend

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Fri Apr 26 05:51:14 GMT 2024

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter