Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » May 23 Summary of Web Tools Project Proposal
May 23 Summary of Web Tools Project Proposal [message #24747] Sun, 23 May 2004 22:11 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
(As part of the membership-at-large comment process, I will be summarizing
the discussions and feedback at the end of each week: April 30, May 7, May
14, May 21, and May 27. This is the fourth of those summaries. I invite you
to correct any errors I have made.)

Unfortunately, there is no progress to report for week four of the
membership-at-large comment period.
The proposal has not been updated to incorporate the feedback from the
community so far.
This week, there were only three messages of significance in the newsgroup
and one on the mailing list: a question and reply involving licenses, a
question about whether the exemplar tools will be useful, and a reply about
PHP inclusion.

I had expected the proposal to be updated last week - now I definitely
expect it to be updated this week. This week was supposed to be the final
week of the comment period, but we will probably extend the comment period
to allow the membership to review, critique, and comment on the revised
proposal.

Summarized by:
WTP Proposal Shepherd (Bjorn Freeman-Benson)
Re: May 23 Summary of Web Tools Project Proposal [message #24930 is a reply to message #24747] Mon, 24 May 2004 09:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
If comments have dried up this week, what is the purpose of extending
the comment period.

On Sun, 23 May 2004 19:11:14 -0700, "Bjorn Freeman-Benson"
<bjorn@superboy.org> wrote:

>(As part of the membership-at-large comment process, I will be summarizing
>the discussions and feedback at the end of each week: April 30, May 7, May
>14, May 21, and May 27. This is the fourth of those summaries. I invite you
>to correct any errors I have made.)
>
>Unfortunately, there is no progress to report for week four of the
>membership-at-large comment period.
>The proposal has not been updated to incorporate the feedback from the
>community so far.
>This week, there were only three messages of significance in the newsgroup
>and one on the mailing list: a question and reply involving licenses, a
>question about whether the exemplar tools will be useful, and a reply about
>PHP inclusion.
>
>I had expected the proposal to be updated last week - now I definitely
>expect it to be updated this week. This week was supposed to be the final
>week of the comment period, but we will probably extend the comment period
>to allow the membership to review, critique, and comment on the revised
>proposal.
>
>Summarized by:
>WTP Proposal Shepherd (Bjorn Freeman-Benson)
>
Re: May 23 Summary of Web Tools Project Proposal [message #25035 is a reply to message #24930] Tue, 25 May 2004 12:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Tom wrote:
> If comments have dried up this week, what is the purpose of extending
> the comment period.
>
> On Sun, 23 May 2004 19:11:14 -0700, "Bjorn Freeman-Benson"
> <bjorn@superboy.org> wrote:
>
>
>>.... This week was supposed to be the final
>>week of the comment period, but we will probably extend the comment period
>>to allow the membership to review, critique, and comment on the revised
>>proposal.
>>
>

Tom,

I agree. The updates to the proprosal were made in response to the
member comments, i.e. we only changed the proposal in ways that the
members suggested, so I don't think the members will need much time to
react to the changes. In general, the comments have been positive and
constructive.

IMHO, it would be more productive to see the proposal taken to the board
for approval so we can proceed with the project. We have a very short
window in June before vacations make group meetings very hard to
schedule until September.

-- Arthur
Re: May 23 Summary of Web Tools Project Proposal [message #25076 is a reply to message #25035] Tue, 25 May 2004 12:59 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
I noticed is that we could use a 'use case' for Listener in the J2EE
Servlet API. I didn't see this, but I might have missed it.

Regards,

Jeff Duska
Previous Topic:WTP proposal feedback: project structure
Next Topic:[ANN] WindowBuilder Pro - Supports SWT & Swing
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 11 01:08:02 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02719 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top