| Junit Classpath [message #249950] |
Sun, 02 December 2007 19:27  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Has there been a change in how Junit 4 is handled between Eclipse versions?
Specifically, I rather suddenly (with Fall Europa) am having to add jars to
the test configuration classpath, which I never had to do previously. In
addition, I am finding it impossible to unit test certain modules.
The wringer in this is I also upgraded to Leopard on OSX, and am having
problems separating this. Unit tests that previously worked now require me
to add a SAX parser to the classpath, for example. I have run these tests
for over a year.
Final summary of question is "What is the difference between the classpath
for unit tests and for the RCP that is generated?" My RCP works fine - I
just don't want to proceed with further development in absence of being able
to test.
- Mike
|
|
|
| Re: Junit Classpath [message #249954 is a reply to message #249950] |
Sun, 02 December 2007 20:32  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Just a followup that I have moved everything to the previous version (Tiger)
of OSX and none of the behavior is altered. So this is NOT because of the
Leopard upgrade.
On 12/2/07 5:27 PM, in article C3789B6A.23A5F%mdean77@comcast.net, "J
Michael Dean" <mdean77@comcast.net> wrote:
> Has there been a change in how Junit 4 is handled between Eclipse versions?
> Specifically, I rather suddenly (with Fall Europa) am having to add jars to
> the test configuration classpath, which I never had to do previously. In
> addition, I am finding it impossible to unit test certain modules.
>
> The wringer in this is I also upgraded to Leopard on OSX, and am having
> problems separating this. Unit tests that previously worked now require me
> to add a SAX parser to the classpath, for example. I have run these tests
> for over a year.
>
> Final summary of question is "What is the difference between the classpath
> for unit tests and for the RCP that is generated?" My RCP works fine - I
> just don't want to proceed with further development in absence of being able
> to test.
>
> - Mike
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03062 seconds
Home