| [ECP] View validation with OCL constraints [message #1398681] |
Fri, 11 July 2014 12:21  |
 Michal Sudra
Messages: 5
Registered: March 2014 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi,
I've enriched the makeithappen ecore model example with a simple OCL constraint and when the constraint is violated I get a following error:
Caused by: org.eclipse.emf.common.util.BasicEList$BasicIndexOutOfBoundsException: index=1, size=1
at org.eclipse.emf.common.util.BasicEList.get(BasicEList.java:346)
at org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.validation.ViewValidator.getDiagnosticForEObject(ViewValidator.java:287)
at org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.validation.ViewValidator.validateAndNotifyControls(ViewValidator.java:127)
at org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.validation.ViewValidator.validate(ViewValidator.java:109)
at org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.validation.ViewValidator.validate(ViewValidator.java:234)
at org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.validation.ValidationService.instantiate(ValidationService.java:279)
at org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.context.ViewModelContextImpl.instantiate(ViewModelContextImpl.java:132)
at org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.context.ViewModelContextImpl.<init>(ViewModelContextImpl.java:112)
at org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.spi.context.ViewModelContextFactory.createViewModelContext(ViewModelContextFactory.java:55)
at org.eclipse.emf.ecp.ui.e4.editor.ECPE4Editor.setInput(ECPE4Editor.java:99)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.MethodRequestor.execute(MethodRequestor.java:56)
... 39 more
The OCLValidationDelegate checks the constraint and returns 'false' so this part works fine, then the EObjectValidator.reportConstraintDelegateViolation is executed which creates new Diagnostic with the violated EObject as data parameter.
When the control gets back to the ViewValidator the following code from getDiagnosticForEObject method is executed
final Map<EStructuralFeature, DiagnosticChain> diagnosticMap = new LinkedHashMap<EStructuralFeature, DiagnosticChain>();
for (final Diagnostic child : diagnostics.getChildren()) {
if (DiagnosticChain.class.isInstance(child)) {
diagnosticMap.put((EStructuralFeature) child.getData().get(1), (DiagnosticChain) child);
}
}
The Diagnostic created in the EObjectValidator.reportConstraintDelegateViolation method has only one element in the data list, so it fails.
Is this a bug or maybe I am missing some configuration? If this is a bug, has it been reported and resolved in newer versions?
I am using eclipse kepler with ecp in version 1.2.0 and org.eclipse.ocl 3.3.0.
Regards,
Michal
|
|
|
| Re: [ECP] View validation with OCL constraints [message #1398692 is a reply to message #1398681] |
Fri, 11 July 2014 12:44  |
Ed Willink
Messages: 7052
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi
I recall that things in this area have been evolving; my OCL unit tests
have to be tolerant to two different EMF layouts because EMF added an
extra value during Luna development.
IMHO Diagnostic code should be bomb-proof so
diagnosticMap.put((EStructuralFeature) child.getData().get(1),
(DiagnosticChain) child);
is really bad; there is no EMF convention that mandates two or more data
elements. Raise a Bugzilla.
ECP might use use two but it cannot be sure that everyone does.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 11/07/2014 13:21, Michal Sudra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've enriched the makeithappen ecore model example with a simple OCL
> constraint and when the constraint is violated I get a following error:
>
>
> Caused by:
> org.eclipse.emf.common.util.BasicEList$BasicIndexOutOfBoundsException:
> index=1, size=1
> at org.eclipse.emf.common.util.BasicEList.get(BasicEList.java:346)
> at
> org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.validation.ViewValidator.getDiagnosticForEObject(ViewValidator.java:287)
> at
> org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.validation.ViewValidator.validateAndNotifyControls(ViewValidator.java:127)
> at
> org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.validation.ViewValidator.validate(ViewValidator.java:109)
> at
> org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.validation.ViewValidator.validate(ViewValidator.java:234)
> at
> org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.validation.ValidationService.instantiate(ValidationService.java:279)
> at
> org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.context.ViewModelContextImpl.instantiate(ViewModelContextImpl.java:132)
> at
> org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.internal.context.ViewModelContextImpl.<init>(ViewModelContextImpl.java:112)
> at
> org.eclipse.emf.ecp.view.spi.context.ViewModelContextFactory.createViewModelContext(ViewModelContextFactory.java:55)
> at
> org.eclipse.emf.ecp.ui.e4.editor.ECPE4Editor.setInput(ECPE4Editor.java:99)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
> at
> org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.MethodRequestor.execute(MethodRequestor.java:56)
> ... 39 more
>
>
> The OCLValidationDelegate checks the constraint and returns 'false' so
> this part works fine, then the
> EObjectValidator.reportConstraintDelegateViolation is executed which
> creates new Diagnostic with the violated EObject as data parameter.
>
> When the control gets back to the ViewValidator the following code
> from getDiagnosticForEObject method is executed
>
> final Map<EStructuralFeature, DiagnosticChain> diagnosticMap = new
> LinkedHashMap<EStructuralFeature, DiagnosticChain>();
> for (final Diagnostic child : diagnostics.getChildren()) {
> if (DiagnosticChain.class.isInstance(child)) {
> diagnosticMap.put((EStructuralFeature) child.getData().get(1),
> (DiagnosticChain) child);
> }
> }
>
> The Diagnostic created in the
> EObjectValidator.reportConstraintDelegateViolation method has only one
> element in the data list, so it fails.
>
> Is this a bug or maybe I am missing some configuration? If this is a
> bug, has it been reported and resolved in newer versions?
> I am using eclipse kepler with ecp in version 1.2.0 and
> org.eclipse.ocl 3.3.0.
>
> Regards,
> Michal
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02146 seconds
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
