Eclipse Community Forums: EclipseLink » EclipseLink 2.3: One-to-one association

Home » Eclipse Projects » EclipseLink » EclipseLink 2.3: One-to-one association(Internal query formation isn't proper)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

EclipseLink 2.3: One-to-one association [message #1386755]

Fri, 20 June 2014 07:00

Subhadip Chatterjee

Messages: 12
Registered: December 2013

Junior Member

Hello,
I am getting an error when I fetch an associated object (1-1), using valueHolder.getValue(). Here is the relational structure:

#"Order-Transfer" model has 1-1 relation with "Order-transfer-accepted-event" model

#In the java bean, OrderTransfer class has the attribute "orderTransferAcceptedEventHolder", of type ValueHolderInterface.

#"Order-transfer-accepted-event" is actually a subclass of "TransferEvent" that is mapped to [Order_Event_Deatil] table in database.

#"TransferEvent" is a subclass of "OrderEvent" class; "OrderEvent" is mapped to [Order_Event] table.

#When I call {orderTranfer}.getOrderTransferAcceptedEventHolder().getValue() -> it internally creates a prepared statement "select from order_event t0, order_event_detail t1 where t1.order_event_no = ?"

Now this statement is missing "select * from..." syntax and hence I am getting

Error message - Exception [EclipseLink-4002] (Eclipse Persistence Services - 2.3.2.v20111125-r10461): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DatabaseException
Internal Exception: java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00936: missing expression

Please suggest.

Report message to a moderator

Re: EclipseLink 2.3: One-to-one association [message #1386814 is a reply to message #1386755]

Fri, 20 June 2014 17:52

Chris Delahunt

Messages: 1249
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

The query used inside the valueholder is somehow incomplete. Looking at your prior questions involving migrating older TopLink projects, this issue could have a number of causes such as a migration or other issue. If it is urgent, I'd suggest filing an Oracle support case who can look at the original and migrated projects and check for conversion issues. Otherwise, is this a new mapping or one that worked in a prior version? Do other valueholder relationships work for you, or is this issue appearing on a few? It would be good to provide the mapping configuration, as well as the query used to bring in the OrderTransfer instance who's valueholder is having the issue. Also, how are you adding the mapping into the session, and when?

Report message to a moderator

Re: EclipseLink 2.3: One-to-one association [message #1386836 is a reply to message #1386814]

Sat, 21 June 2014 10:15

Subhadip Chatterjee

Messages: 12
Registered: December 2013

Junior Member

Hello Chris,
Yes this is part of the newly created EclipseLink mappings. As part of the migration, we actually created all new set of configurations, referring the old TopLink config xmls, using EclipseLink workbench.

The 1-1 mapping works in many other cases, so I am unable to comprehend the reason in this case. Have you got any clue?

Report message to a moderator

Re: EclipseLink 2.3: One-to-one association [message #1387043 is a reply to message #1386836]

Mon, 23 June 2014 16:39

Chris Delahunt

Messages: 1249
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

No clue at this point, especially that your workaround to another issue was to call initialize on something directly, something that should be initialized when the session is logged in. Can you post the problem mapping and include the query bringing in the OrderTransfer as this might also help shed light on what is happening.

Report message to a moderator

Re: EclipseLink 2.3: One-to-one association [message #1387505 is a reply to message #1387043]

Wed, 25 June 2014 07:25

Subhadip Chatterjee

Messages: 12
Registered: December 2013

Junior Member

Hello,
Please find the code snippet which is used to initialize:

Iterator<?> descItr = session.getDescriptors().values().iterator();
while (descI.hasNext()) {
	ClassDescriptor descriptor = (ClassDescriptor) descItr.next();
	...
	for (Iterator<?> mapItr = descriptor.getMappings().iterator(); mapItr.hasNext();) {
		DatabaseMapping mapping = (DatabaseMapping) mapItr.next();
		...
		if (mapping.isForeignReferenceMapping()) {
			...
			if mapping-field-is-of-ValueHolder-type { // 1-1 mapping
				ContainerIndirectionPolicy policy = new ContainerIndirectionPolicy();
				policy.setMapping(mapping);
				policy.setContainerClass(CONTAINER_CLASS);
				policy.initialize(); // To set the container-constructor						
				((ForeignReferenceMapping) mapping).setIndirectionPolicy(policy);
			}
		}
	}
}

Now the {policy.initialize()} had to be called to fix the mapping issues, during code migration.

Now the OrderTransfer mapping is:

<class-mapping-descriptor xsi:type="relational-class-mapping-descriptor">
	<class>business.trade.model.OrderTransfer</class>
	<alias>OrderTransfer</alias>
	<primary-key>
	<field table="ORDER_TRANSFER" name="ORDER_TRANSFER_ID" xsi:type="column"/>
	</primary-key>
	...
	<attribute-mapping xsi:type="one-to-one-mapping">
	  <attribute-name>orderEventAcceptedHolder</attribute-name>
	  <get-method>getOrderEventAcceptedHolder</get-method>
	  <set-method>setOrderEventAcceptedHolder</set-method>
	  <reference-class>business.order.model.event.TransferEvent</reference-class>
	  <foreign-key>
		<field-reference>
		  <source-field table="ORDER_TRANSFER" name="ORDER_EVENT_NO_ACCEPTED" xsi:type="column"/>
		  <target-field table="ORDER_EVENT_DETAIL" name="ORDER_EVENT_NO" xsi:type="column"/>
		</field-reference>
	  </foreign-key>
	  <foreign-key-fields>
		<field table="ORDER_TRANSFER" name="ORDER_EVENT_NO_ACCEPTED" xsi:type="column"/>
	  </foreign-key-fields>
	  <selection-query xsi:type="read-object-query"/>
	</attribute-mapping>
	...
</class-mapping>

And the TransferEvent mapping, is

<class-mapping-descriptor xsi:type="relational-class-mapping-descriptor">
	<class>business.order.model.event.TransferEvent</class>
	<alias>TransferEvent</alias>
	<primary-key>
		<field table="ORDER_EVENT_DETAIL" name="ORDER_EVENT_NO" xsi:type="column"/>
	</primary-key>
	...
	<attribute-mapping xsi:type="one-to-one-mapping">
		<attribute-name>orderTransferAcceptedHolder</attribute-name>
		<get-method>getOrderTransferAcceptedHolder</get-method>
		<set-method>setOrderTransferAcceptedHolder</set-method>
		<reference-class>business.trade.model.OrderTransfer</reference-class>
		<foreign-key>
			<field-reference>
				<source-field table="ORDER_EVENT_DETAIL" name="ORDER_EVENT_NO" xsi:type="column"/>
				<target-field table="ORDER_TRANSFER" name="ORDER_EVENT_NO_ACCEPTED" xsi:type="column"/>
			</field-reference>
		</foreign-key>
		<selection-query xsi:type="read-object-query"/>
	</attribute-mapping>
	...
</class-mapping-descriptor>

The issue comes when, this code is invoked: orderTransfer.getOrderEventAcceptedHolder().getValue().

This is query generated, which lacks [SELECT *]
"select from order_event t0, order_event_detail t1 where t1.order_event_no = ?"

Hope you get the hint from this.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	eclipselink stackoverflow exceptions - repeating same query thousand of time
Next Topic:	Moxy map attribute that doesn't exist in the object model.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Thu Aug 17 06:44:50 GMT 2017

.:: Contact :: Home ::.