|
| Re: status of pdt project + some thoughts [message #22798 is a reply to message #22581] |
Mon, 21 May 2007 20:06  |
 Ali B.
Messages: 66
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
I agree with Exception here when it comes to the dedicated website
thing, I don't know if there are any boundaries for having one by
Eclipse.org. If not, I am willing to setup and adopt an official website
for PDT, a
community oriented/driven one, if the team is willing to have one and ok
with the idea of course. Would be a humble thank you for the PDT
wonderful team and work.
As for the wiki, I am trying to write an xdebug plugin tutorial to put
on the PDT wiki section, but I don't think that you can add any
additional documents there, at least I couldn't find how.
Cheers,
Ali
Exception e wrote:
> I am curious about the current developments in the pdt project.
> What will be in the next release? I know the list of
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/PDT_1.0_Features_Proposal, but what
> components will be included?
> What is the opinion of the pdt team about my request for aptana integration
> [https://www.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=183586]?
>
> As a sidenote, the eclipse site is really awful. Once you are in the pdt
> wiki, there is no way to access other pages from the menu. Instead one have
> to go back to the main wiki page of pdt. I think a dedicated site to pdt is
> the best way to go. What I see now is that information about pdt [debugging
> for instance] is being scattered around the net. Just my 2 cents. :-)
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03033 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
