| Illegal token characters in babel fragment names [message #22413] |
Thu, 23 October 2008 12:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: sf.tragwerk-software.de
Hi !
First let me thank you all for the great work on tranlation / tools
already been done.
I recently updated to the new language packs (German).
I noticed a change in the names of the fragments.
The old pattern was *.nl_de
which is now *.nl-de
So the underscore changed to minus.
Unfortunattely the minus is an illegal value for fragment tokens.
When I manually add NL-fragments to a Feature of my RCP-application, I
recieve warnings like this from PDE:
Illegal value 'org.eclipse.ant.core.nl-de' for attribute 'id'. Legal
token characters are "a-z", "A-Z", "0-9", "_". Tokens must be
separated by "." feature.xml
Furthermore I have to change my runtime configuration which is annoying.
Is it a bug or a feature ?
Would it be possible to switch back to the traditional naming convention ?
Sebastian
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Illegal token characters in babel fragment names [message #575413 is a reply to message #22413] |
Fri, 24 October 2008 18:52  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: atoulme.intalio.com
Hi Sebastian,
sounds like a bug to me. Can you open a bugzilla entry, and give the
link here ?
Thanks,
Antoine
Sebastian Fuchs wrote:
> Hi !
>
> First let me thank you all for the great work on tranlation / tools
> already been done.
>
> I recently updated to the new language packs (German).
> I noticed a change in the names of the fragments.
>
> The old pattern was *.nl_de
> which is now *.nl-de
> So the underscore changed to minus.
>
> Unfortunattely the minus is an illegal value for fragment tokens.
> When I manually add NL-fragments to a Feature of my RCP-application, I
> recieve warnings like this from PDE:
>
> Illegal value 'org.eclipse.ant.core.nl-de' for attribute 'id'. Legal
> token characters are "a-z", "A-Z", "0-9", "_". Tokens must be separated
> by "." feature.xml
>
> Furthermore I have to change my runtime configuration which is annoying.
>
>
> Is it a bug or a feature ?
> Would it be possible to switch back to the traditional naming convention ?
>
> Sebastian
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03671 seconds
Home