| 
| Affinity Domains [message #22024] | Fri, 03 November 2006 15:51  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Hi, 
 At the meeting in Chicago discussing the HIMSS participation there was a bit
 of talk about there being several different affinity domains.  Does anyone
 know what the requirements are regarding affinity domain for both the MESA
 test (if there are any), Connectathon, and HIMSS demonstration?
 Does anyone know what type of functionality we need to implement to support
 this?  Would be just as simple as doing the same queries/actions over
 multiple RHIOs (as far as looking for documents is concerned).
 
 I am just trying to get an idea as to what the requirements are, and how we
 can go about supporting it.
 |  |  |  | 
| 
| Re: Affinity Domains [message #22212 is a reply to message #22024] | Fri, 03 November 2006 20:09  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Hi Corey, 
 Your suspicion is correct. For connectathion you will have to do every
 transaction you complete fro MESA test with 3 separate vendors. So for
 document query, you will have to sucessfully query against 3 different
 registries. For MESA testing your PIX/PDQ tests will al be done against
 the MESA PC and your XDS tests against the NIST server. So essentially
 the MESA PC and the NIST server act as a single Affinity Domain for MESA
 tests.
 
 THe OHF bridge is your proxy to all Affinity Domains/ RHIOS. For MESA
 testing ... we have essentially created a test RHIO jsut for you that
 includes your MESA PC and the NIST server IP information. Come
 connectathon and HIMSS we will work together to load all the different
 testing configurations into the OHF bridge. Then switching between RHIOs
 will be a simple selection for you (choose a different session context).
 
 Hope this clarifies,
 Sarah
 
 Corey Spears wrote:
 > Hi,
 >
 > At the meeting in Chicago discussing the HIMSS participation there was a bit
 > of talk about there being several different affinity domains.  Does anyone
 > know what the requirements are regarding affinity domain for both the MESA
 > test (if there are any), Connectathon, and HIMSS demonstration?
 > Does anyone know what type of functionality we need to implement to support
 > this?  Would be just as simple as doing the same queries/actions over
 > multiple RHIOs (as far as looking for documents is concerned).
 >
 > I am just trying to get an idea as to what the requirements are, and how we
 > can go about supporting it.
 >
 >
 |  |  |  | 
| 
| Re: Affinity Domains [message #572046 is a reply to message #22024] | Fri, 03 November 2006 20:09  |  | 
| Eclipse User  |  |  |  |  | Hi Corey, 
 Your suspicion is correct. For connectathion you will have to do every
 transaction you complete fro MESA test with 3 separate vendors. So for
 document query, you will have to sucessfully query against 3 different
 registries. For MESA testing your PIX/PDQ tests will al be done against
 the MESA PC and your XDS tests against the NIST server. So essentially
 the MESA PC and the NIST server act as a single Affinity Domain for MESA
 tests.
 
 THe OHF bridge is your proxy to all Affinity Domains/ RHIOS. For MESA
 testing ... we have essentially created a test RHIO jsut for you that
 includes your MESA PC and the NIST server IP information. Come
 connectathon and HIMSS we will work together to load all the different
 testing configurations into the OHF bridge. Then switching between RHIOs
 will be a simple selection for you (choose a different session context).
 
 Hope this clarifies,
 Sarah
 
 Corey Spears wrote:
 > Hi,
 >
 > At the meeting in Chicago discussing the HIMSS participation there was a bit
 > of talk about there being several different affinity domains.  Does anyone
 > know what the requirements are regarding affinity domain for both the MESA
 > test (if there are any), Connectathon, and HIMSS demonstration?
 > Does anyone know what type of functionality we need to implement to support
 > this?  Would be just as simple as doing the same queries/actions over
 > multiple RHIOs (as far as looking for documents is concerned).
 >
 > I am just trying to get an idea as to what the requirements are, and how we
 > can go about supporting it.
 >
 >
 |  |  |  | 
Powered by 
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05437 seconds