Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums

      Home
Home » Archived » EPF » OpenUP/Basic 0.9 Alignment Review
OpenUP/Basic 0.9 Alignment Review [message #21940] Fri, 27 October 2006 17:52 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Hello,

I'm performing a top-to-bottom review of OpenUP/Basic 0.9 in an attempt
to make the content more "even" and align the discipline descriptions.
The review focuses on:

* Removing content that doesn’t apply to small agile teams
* Removing excessive content that small teams are not likely to read or use
* Identifying more examples and guidance that would benefit small teams
* Align disciplines with other areas of OpenUP (e.g. using the WIL)
* General comments on discipline practices

The review of the Requirements Management discipline is complete and
issues have been added to Bugzilla. For those that are interested,
please take a look. They can be accessed at:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162627
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162639
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162638
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162636
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162637
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162628
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162629
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162634
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162641

More disciplines to come...

- Jim
jruehlin@us.ibm.com
Re: OpenUP/Basic 0.9 Alignment Review [message #24473 is a reply to message #21940] Wed, 22 November 2006 09:54 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Jim et al

I have today provided supplementary review comments against the issues
described in these bugzilla entries:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162628 (Role Analyst)

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162634 (RM Tasks)

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162636 (RM Concepts)

I have done this in the form of attaching a new version of the review
spreadsheet for each.

Ben


Jim Ruehlin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm performing a top-to-bottom review of OpenUP/Basic 0.9 in an
> attempt to make the content more "even" and align the discipline
> descriptions. The review focuses on:
>
> * Removing content that doesn’t apply to small agile teams
> * Removing excessive content that small teams are not likely to read
> or use
> * Identifying more examples and guidance that would benefit small teams
> * Align disciplines with other areas of OpenUP (e.g. using the WIL)
> * General comments on discipline practices
>
> The review of the Requirements Management discipline is complete and
> issues have been added to Bugzilla. For those that are interested,
> please take a look. They can be accessed at:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162627
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162639
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162638
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162636
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162637
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162628
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162629
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162634
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162641
>
> More disciplines to come...
>
> - Jim
> jruehlin@us.ibm.com
>
Re: OpenUP/Basic 0.9 Alignment Review [message #568995 is a reply to message #21940] Wed, 22 November 2006 09:54 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Jim et al

I have today provided supplementary review comments against the issues
described in these bugzilla entries:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162628 (Role Analyst)

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162634 (RM Tasks)

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162636 (RM Concepts)

I have done this in the form of attaching a new version of the review
spreadsheet for each.

Ben


Jim Ruehlin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm performing a top-to-bottom review of OpenUP/Basic 0.9 in an
> attempt to make the content more "even" and align the discipline
> descriptions. The review focuses on:
>
> * Removing content that doesn’t apply to small agile teams
> * Removing excessive content that small teams are not likely to read
> or use
> * Identifying more examples and guidance that would benefit small teams
> * Align disciplines with other areas of OpenUP (e.g. using the WIL)
> * General comments on discipline practices
>
> The review of the Requirements Management discipline is complete and
> issues have been added to Bugzilla. For those that are interested,
> please take a look. They can be accessed at:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162627
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162639
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162638
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162636
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162637
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162628
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162629
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162634
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=162641
>
> More disciplines to come...
>
> - Jim
> jruehlin@us.ibm.com
>
Previous Topic:Guidance Types
Next Topic:about chinese character
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed May 07 19:01:47 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02873 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top

Sign up to our Newsletter

A fresh new issue delivered monthly