| Any Committer Members? [message #21258] |
Fri, 15 July 2005 12:34  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi all,
I notice that there are four different categories of foundation
membership (strategic, add-in provider, associate, and committer), but
that only members belonging to the first three are listed on eclipse.org.
I'm curious if there are, in fact, any committer members and, if so, how
many? It's a particularly interesting category, since it's suggestive
of individuals who are interested in the technology for its own sake,
and not companies interested in the commercialization of it.
Thanks,
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any Committer Members? [message #22136 is a reply to message #21284] |
Tue, 26 July 2005 15:01  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
That is correct. But the interesting wrinkle is that committers who work for
Member companies have all of the rights and privileges of a Committer
Member, without having to individually sign the Membership Agreement.
So the way I count them is whether or not they have the right to vote in the
committer representative board elections. And currently there are 425++ of
those.
.....I am not sure if this helps or just makes things even more confusing :-)
"Bjorn Freeman-Benson" <bjorn.freeman-benson@eclipse.org> wrote in message
news:dbh2g7$iuq$1@news.eclipse.org...
> That's not correct. You can have commit rights without being a Committer
> Member of the Foundation. Most committers are not Committer Members
> because they are employees of a Member Company. There are a number of
> individual Committer Members outside of the Member Companies - something
> on the order of three dozen - but I don't have the exact numbers in front
> of me. There are a few more people with commit rights who are not
> Committer Members.
>
>> My understanding is that anyone with commit rights to any Eclipse project
>> is a committer member of the foundation. So, there are hundreds of
>> committer members (I have no idea exactly how many).
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04262 seconds
Home