| Is there any build for Galileo [message #20927] |
Wed, 24 June 2009 08:01  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Is there any build for Galileo?
Current (200505051158) don't work
log:
Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not
be found.
Software being installed: Eclipse IAM Dependency Viewer
0.9.0.200905051159 (org.eclipse.iam.feature.dependencyviewer.feature.group
0.9.0.200905051159)
Missing requirement: Eclipse IAM Dependency Viewer 0.9.0.200905051159
(org.eclipse.iam.feature.dependencyviewer.feature.group
0.9.0.200905051159) requires 'com.ibm.icu [3.6.0,4.0.0)' but it could not
be found
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Is there any build for Galileo [message #20975 is a reply to message #20971] |
Tue, 30 June 2009 00:21  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I'll install and test with Subclipse to see if I can find what is
causing this.
We usually test with Subversive (hosted at
http://eclipse.org/subversive) instead... maybe that will work for you
as a workaround?
Additionally, you would get the Import from Svn feature (installing the
Subsersive integration from IAM updte site).
Cheers!
BenH wrote:
> BenH wrote:
>> A couple of minutes ago I was able to install into a fresh Eclipse 3.5
>> from:
>> http://q4e.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/updatesite-iam/
>
>> And, this seems to have cured the Endless Rebuilding problem I posted
>> about last week. Hooray!! 8)
>
> Oh no, I spoke too soon! Its come back, but I did get a clue that may be
> valuable:
>
> The Endless Rebuilding may be an interaction with Subclipse. It showed
> up again right after I installed Subclipse 1.6.x into 3.5, and did a SVN
> update to test Subclipse. (Previously I used Subclipse 1.4.x too)
>
> Smells like some file modification times are being messed with?
>
> Abel, is there some svn property that might resolve this, svn:ignore or
> similar?
> Note my "target" folder shows as "unversioned" and subclipse doesnt
> allow me to set a SVN property on it.
>
> -Ben
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Is there any build for Galileo [message #569842 is a reply to message #20927] |
Wed, 24 June 2009 10:52 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
There is a version tested against RC4 announced on the dev list (update
site at http://q4e.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/p2-nightly/). Check the
installation instructions:
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/iam-dev/msg00457.html
I am now testing that version with the final Galileo version and expect
tahat we can publish a fully compatible version later today, with a
propper categorization to make installing simpler.
Michał Kudła wrote:
> Is there any build for Galileo?
> Current (200505051158) don't work
> log:
> Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not
> be found.
> Software being installed: Eclipse IAM Dependency Viewer
> 0.9.0.200905051159 (org.eclipse.iam.feature.dependencyviewer.feature.group
> 0.9.0.200905051159)
> Missing requirement: Eclipse IAM Dependency Viewer 0.9.0.200905051159
> (org.eclipse.iam.feature.dependencyviewer.feature.group
> 0.9.0.200905051159) requires 'com.ibm.icu [3.6.0,4.0.0)' but it could not
> be found
|
|
|
| Re: Is there any build for Galileo [message #569932 is a reply to message #20932] |
Fri, 26 June 2009 03:27 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Abel Muiño skrev:
> There is a version tested against RC4 announced on the dev list (update
> site at http://q4e.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/p2-nightly/). Check the
> installation instructions:
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/iam-dev/msg00457.html
>
> I am now testing that version with the final Galileo version and expect
> tahat we can publish a fully compatible version later today, with a
> propper categorization to make installing simpler.
>
> Michał Kudła wrote:
>
>> Is there any build for Galileo?
>> Current (200505051158) don't work
>
>> log:
>> Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could
>> not be found.
>> Software being installed: Eclipse IAM Dependency Viewer
>> 0.9.0.200905051159
>> (org.eclipse.iam.feature.dependencyviewer.feature.group
>> 0.9.0.200905051159)
>> Missing requirement: Eclipse IAM Dependency Viewer
>> 0.9.0.200905051159
>> (org.eclipse.iam.feature.dependencyviewer.feature.group
>> 0.9.0.200905051159) requires 'com.ibm.icu [3.6.0,4.0.0)' but it could
>> not be found
>
>
Any progress?
|
|
|
| Re: Is there any build for Galileo [message #569951 is a reply to message #20951] |
Sat, 27 June 2009 08:07 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
We'll do a propper announcement later, but a new build compatible with
Galileo has been uploaded to:
Anybody using Eclipse 3.4 and upgrading to this build, note that it
requires EMF Compare 1.0, so the following update site must be added (no
need to check anything from it, dependencies will be resolved and pulled
by p2 automatically):
http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emft/updates/releases/
Enjoy and share your feedback!
Jens Ohlsson wrote:
> Abel Muiño skrev:
>> There is a version tested against RC4 announced on the dev list
>> (update site at http://q4e.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/p2-nightly/).
>> Check the installation instructions:
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/iam-dev/msg00457.html
>>
>> I am now testing that version with the final Galileo version and
>> expect tahat we can publish a fully compatible version later today,
>> with a propper categorization to make installing simpler.
>>
>> Michał Kudła wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any build for Galileo?
>>> Current (200505051158) don't work
>>
>>> log:
>>> Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could
>>> not be found.
>>> Software being installed: Eclipse IAM Dependency Viewer
>>> 0.9.0.200905051159
>>> (org.eclipse.iam.feature.dependencyviewer.feature.group
>>> 0.9.0.200905051159)
>>> Missing requirement: Eclipse IAM Dependency Viewer
>>> 0.9.0.200905051159
>>> (org.eclipse.iam.feature.dependencyviewer.feature.group
>>> 0.9.0.200905051159) requires 'com.ibm.icu [3.6.0,4.0.0)' but it could
>>> not be found
>>
>>
>
> Any progress?
|
|
|
|
| Re: Is there any build for Galileo [message #570015 is a reply to message #20966] |
Mon, 29 June 2009 20:57 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
BenH wrote:
> A couple of minutes ago I was able to install into a fresh Eclipse 3.5
> from:
> http://q4e.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/updatesite-iam/
> And, this seems to have cured the Endless Rebuilding problem I posted
> about last week. Hooray!! 8)
Oh no, I spoke too soon! Its come back, but I did get a clue that may be
valuable:
The Endless Rebuilding may be an interaction with Subclipse. It showed up
again right after I installed Subclipse 1.6.x into 3.5, and did a SVN
update to test Subclipse. (Previously I used Subclipse 1.4.x too)
Smells like some file modification times are being messed with?
Abel, is there some svn property that might resolve this, svn:ignore or
similar?
Note my "target" folder shows as "unversioned" and subclipse doesnt allow
me to set a SVN property on it.
-Ben
|
|
|
| Re: Is there any build for Galileo [message #570034 is a reply to message #20971] |
Tue, 30 June 2009 00:21 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I'll install and test with Subclipse to see if I can find what is
causing this.
We usually test with Subversive (hosted at
http://eclipse.org/subversive) instead... maybe that will work for you
as a workaround?
Additionally, you would get the Import from Svn feature (installing the
Subsersive integration from IAM updte site).
Cheers!
BenH wrote:
> BenH wrote:
>> A couple of minutes ago I was able to install into a fresh Eclipse 3.5
>> from:
>> http://q4e.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/updatesite-iam/
>
>> And, this seems to have cured the Endless Rebuilding problem I posted
>> about last week. Hooray!! 8)
>
> Oh no, I spoke too soon! Its come back, but I did get a clue that may be
> valuable:
>
> The Endless Rebuilding may be an interaction with Subclipse. It showed
> up again right after I installed Subclipse 1.6.x into 3.5, and did a SVN
> update to test Subclipse. (Previously I used Subclipse 1.4.x too)
>
> Smells like some file modification times are being messed with?
>
> Abel, is there some svn property that might resolve this, svn:ignore or
> similar?
> Note my "target" folder shows as "unversioned" and subclipse doesnt
> allow me to set a SVN property on it.
>
> -Ben
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.09433 seconds
Home