|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Migration of plug-in from WSAD 5.0.1 to Eclipse 2.1.2 [message #582537 is a reply to message #20743] |
Thu, 26 February 2004 12:57  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Janak,
I've just posted such a migration path in the previous thread "Adding new
Beans to the Palette"
Tell me if it's what you're looking for.
Regarding Eclipse 3.0 and VE 1.0 I think you could have a look at the plugin
files to see how deeply they changed (that's what I'm going to do anyway,
I'll keep you posted)
Sebastien.
"janak" <janak.mulani@canoo.com> wrote in message
news:c1komh$no8$1@eclipse.org...
>
> We have a plug-in for WSAD 5.0.1 (and Visual Editor) which we would like
> to port to Eclipse 2.1.2 and VE 0.5.0.
>
> Is there any documentation about the migration path one needs to take?
>
> Will the subsequent port to Eclipse 3.0 and VE 1.0 be a big step?
>
> Thanks
>
> - Janak
> janak.mulani@canoo.com
>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Migration of plug-in from WSAD 5.0.1 to Eclipse 2.1.2 [message #582649 is a reply to message #20824] |
Fri, 27 February 2004 05:15  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Sebastien,
Many thanks.
Actually just after doing yesterday's post I set about changing Joe's
palette example for Eclipse 2.1.2. And I made all the changes (to xml and
xmi) that you have listed in your solution.
I ran Joe's example palette in WSAD 5.0.1 and it ran fine.
I then ran the "changed for Eclipse example palette" but it does not run
because it is not able to find the Bean Jars (even after setting the
variable). It seems the Classpath specification has changed between WSAD
5.0.1 and Eclipse 2.1.2. To make the Eclipse example run I had to
explicitly include the bean jars in the build path.
Have you experienced this?
(I am taking the liberty to send my Eclipse plug-in to you for
verification, pl install and run it if you have time.)
> Tell me if it's what you're looking for.
Sure this helps and as said earlier I did the same after posting my query.
But it takes lot of groping around and ends up in taking a path that
perhaps others have already taken.
So it would help a lot if:
1. There is a global picture of what all needs to change.
2. And info about the semantics of change and specifics where possible.
> Regarding Eclipse 3.0 and VE 1.0 I think you could have a look at the plugin
> files to see how deeply they changed (that's what I'm going to do anyway,
> I'll keep you posted)
Thanks.
Actually what I meant was is it a good idea to go to Eclipse 2.1.2 and VE
0.5.0 from WSAD 5.0.1 or should we go to Eclipse 3.0 and VE 1.0.0?
- Janak
|
|
|
Re: Migration of plug-in from WSAD 5.0.1 to Eclipse 2.1.2 [message #582668 is a reply to message #21331] |
Fri, 27 February 2004 08:52  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richkulp.NO.SPAM.us.ibm.com
You can go to 0.5.0 and from there to the current 1.0.0. The override
files are the same format at this time for 0.5.0 and 1.0.0, however, in
the next few weeks we are stepping up to the EMF Opensource version of
the override files (from our private internal version), which is a
different format. However, since we have to do the conversion ourselves
of our many files, I'm going to see about writing a conversion utility
to convert the 1.0.0 current format to the new format. And I'll put this
utility out on the VEP site when ready.
--
Thanks, Rich Kulp
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06224 seconds