| [EMF Forms] Dynamic EMF not supported [message #1269022] |
Tue, 11 March 2014 05:33  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
I created my model using dynamic EMF as described here: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-eclipse-dynamicemf/
After passing EObject to the ECPSWTViewRenderer I can see nothing.
After small investigation I found that ReflectiveItemProviderAdapterFactory is not used all the time, especially ECPAbstractControl is bulding EditingDomain based on ComposedAdapterFactory.Descriptor.Registry.INSTANCE only.
Should I request a bug or maybe it was done on purpose. If yes, what's a purpose of that?
Cheers,
Paweł.
|
|
|
| Re: [EMF Forms] Dynamic EMF not supported [message #1269089 is a reply to message #1269022] |
Tue, 11 March 2014 07:09  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Pawel,
thank you for reporting this!
There is currently no explicit support for dynamic EMF, but this is
definitely not on purpose...;)
In the contrary we are working on getting Dynamic EMF to work with ECP
as expected, since we need it for the improved IDE tooling. The 1.3.x
releases will contain this support, it will soon also be available on
the develop branch and therefore in the nightly builds.
It would be great if you opened an explicit bug. If you would like to
get early access, please let me know. Contributions are also welcome at
any point!
Cheers,
Maximilian
Am 11.03.2014 10:33, schrieb Paweł Doleciński:
> Hi,
>
> I created my model using dynamic EMF as described here:
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-eclipse-dynamicemf/
>
> After passing EObject to the ECPSWTViewRenderer I can see nothing.
> After small investigation I found that
> ReflectiveItemProviderAdapterFactory is not used all the time,
> especially ECPAbstractControl is bulding EditingDomain based on
> ComposedAdapterFactory.Descriptor.Registry.INSTANCE only.
>
> Should I request a bug or maybe it was done on purpose. If yes, what's a
> purpose of that?
>
> Cheers,
> Paweł.
--
Maximilian Kögel
Get Professional Eclipse Support: http://eclipsesource.com/munich
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.07584 seconds
Home