Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » Can future webtools developer work on Lomboz?
| Can future webtools developer work on Lomboz? [message #19196] |
Tue, 23 March 2004 10:59  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: Jeff.Duska.REMOVE_ME.noaa.gov
I've seen some comments that CPL and GPL/LGPL are not compatible. While
this project seems to be on hold, I'd like to look at or work with the
Lomboz codebase. Since it is under LGPL, will this exclude me from
contributing to the webtools project?
If the Objectweb folks are listening, do you have any plans to change
Lomboz to CPL?
Thanks,
Jeff Duska
|
|
|
| Re: Can future webtools developer work on Lomboz? [message #19199 is a reply to message #19196] |
Tue, 23 March 2004 11:00  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: robert.varga.fathomtechnology.com
As far as I know, the license of either tool does not prevent you to work on
the other tool, the only restriction is that
code cannot be copied from one tool to the other (except if you are the
original author of the code to-be-copied, in which
case you are perfectly allowed to contribute that code to both places).
And actually since the web tools project will be THE official web tools
project,
probably Lomboz will be modified to build on that foundation.
Regards,
Robert Varga
"Jeff.Duska" <Jeff.Duska@REMOVE_ME.noaa.gov> wrote in message
news:c3pmi5$et$1@eclipse.org...
> I've seen some comments that CPL and GPL/LGPL are not compatible. While
> this project seems to be on hold, I'd like to look at or work with the
> Lomboz codebase. Since it is under LGPL, will this exclude me from
> contributing to the webtools project?
>
> If the Objectweb folks are listening, do you have any plans to change
> Lomboz to CPL?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff Duska
|
|
|
| Re: Can future webtools developer work on Lomboz? [message #19654 is a reply to message #19199] |
Fri, 26 March 2004 03:56 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
LGPL was the preffered ObjectWeb license, that was the only reason why
Lomboz is LGPL. But we will, if there is every any need, change our
licensing to match eclipse (EPL or CPL)
"Robert Varga" <robert.varga@fathomtechnology.com> wrote in message
news:c3pmpg$139$1@eclipse.org...
> As far as I know, the license of either tool does not prevent you to work
on
> the other tool, the only restriction is that
> code cannot be copied from one tool to the other (except if you are the
> original author of the code to-be-copied, in which
> case you are perfectly allowed to contribute that code to both places).
>
> And actually since the web tools project will be THE official web tools
> project,
> probably Lomboz will be modified to build on that foundation.
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert Varga
>
> "Jeff.Duska" <Jeff.Duska@REMOVE_ME.noaa.gov> wrote in message
> news:c3pmi5$et$1@eclipse.org...
> > I've seen some comments that CPL and GPL/LGPL are not compatible. While
> > this project seems to be on hold, I'd like to look at or work with the
> > Lomboz codebase. Since it is under LGPL, will this exclude me from
> > contributing to the webtools project?
> >
> > If the Objectweb folks are listening, do you have any plans to change
> > Lomboz to CPL?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jeff Duska
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Can future webtools developer work on Lomboz? [message #19699 is a reply to message #19654] |
Fri, 26 March 2004 12:06 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: robert.varga.fathomtechnology.com
I guess the question was about developers being or not being allowed to work
on both projects.
Regards,
Robert Varga
"Naci Dai" <naci.dai@eteration.com> wrote in message
news:c40qug$3l1$1@eclipse.org...
> LGPL was the preffered ObjectWeb license, that was the only reason why
> Lomboz is LGPL. But we will, if there is every any need, change our
> licensing to match eclipse (EPL or CPL)
>
>
> "Robert Varga" <robert.varga@fathomtechnology.com> wrote in message
> news:c3pmpg$139$1@eclipse.org...
> > As far as I know, the license of either tool does not prevent you to
work
> on
> > the other tool, the only restriction is that
> > code cannot be copied from one tool to the other (except if you are the
> > original author of the code to-be-copied, in which
> > case you are perfectly allowed to contribute that code to both places).
> >
> > And actually since the web tools project will be THE official web tools
> > project,
> > probably Lomboz will be modified to build on that foundation.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Robert Varga
> >
> > "Jeff.Duska" <Jeff.Duska@REMOVE_ME.noaa.gov> wrote in message
> > news:c3pmi5$et$1@eclipse.org...
> > > I've seen some comments that CPL and GPL/LGPL are not compatible.
While
> > > this project seems to be on hold, I'd like to look at or work with the
> > > Lomboz codebase. Since it is under LGPL, will this exclude me from
> > > contributing to the webtools project?
> > >
> > > If the Objectweb folks are listening, do you have any plans to change
> > > Lomboz to CPL?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jeff Duska
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Can future webtools developer work on Lomboz? [message #19867 is a reply to message #19699] |
Sat, 27 March 2004 04:26 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I can only speak about Lomboz - We will welcome new contributors.
Eclipse has different model for contributors, you can visit some of the
active projects to find out how to contribute. I suspect, webtools will be
similar.
"Robert Varga" <robert.varga@fathomtechnology.com> wrote in message
news:c41nps$90s$1@eclipse.org...
> I guess the question was about developers being or not being allowed to
work
> on both projects.
>
> Regards,
>
> Robert Varga
>
> "Naci Dai" <naci.dai@eteration.com> wrote in message
> news:c40qug$3l1$1@eclipse.org...
> > LGPL was the preffered ObjectWeb license, that was the only reason why
> > Lomboz is LGPL. But we will, if there is every any need, change our
> > licensing to match eclipse (EPL or CPL)
> >
> >
> > "Robert Varga" <robert.varga@fathomtechnology.com> wrote in message
> > news:c3pmpg$139$1@eclipse.org...
> > > As far as I know, the license of either tool does not prevent you to
> work
> > on
> > > the other tool, the only restriction is that
> > > code cannot be copied from one tool to the other (except if you are
the
> > > original author of the code to-be-copied, in which
> > > case you are perfectly allowed to contribute that code to both
places).
> > >
> > > And actually since the web tools project will be THE official web
tools
> > > project,
> > > probably Lomboz will be modified to build on that foundation.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Robert Varga
> > >
> > > "Jeff.Duska" <Jeff.Duska@REMOVE_ME.noaa.gov> wrote in message
> > > news:c3pmi5$et$1@eclipse.org...
> > > > I've seen some comments that CPL and GPL/LGPL are not compatible.
> While
> > > > this project seems to be on hold, I'd like to look at or work with
the
> > > > Lomboz codebase. Since it is under LGPL, will this exclude me from
> > > > contributing to the webtools project?
> > > >
> > > > If the Objectweb folks are listening, do you have any plans to
change
> > > > Lomboz to CPL?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Jeff Duska
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
| |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 08 09:47:05 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06840 seconds |
Home