|
|
| Re: Quick model migration beofre using Edapt or Sphinx [message #1216042 is a reply to message #1214455] |
Thu, 28 November 2013 09:50   |
 Pascal Gula
Messages: 5
Registered: November 2013 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Hi Ed,
indeed, the development of a metamodel and the according tooling leads in its lifecycle to some modifications that makes un-loadable models that have been developed with previous version of it.
For example, it is not a problem when adding attributes to some elements of the metamodel, but when renaming or suppressing some, the saved resource model won't be able to load properly. My goal is indeed to intercept in the loading process such event and post-process them to be able to load the model properly (with some know rules).
As I said, we are not able to use plug-ins developed for that purpose right now (like Edapt or Sphinx), but we need to implement a quick solution.
By the way, is there any comparison of solutions like Edapt or Sphinx or others available?
Regards,
Pascal
|
|
|
| Re: Quick model migration beofre using Edapt or Sphinx [message #1216879 is a reply to message #1216042] |
Thu, 28 November 2013 17:24 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 30688
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Pascal,
Comments below.
On 28/11/2013 10:50 AM, Pascal Gula wrote:
> Hi Ed,
> indeed, the development of a metamodel and the according tooling leads
> in its lifecycle to some modifications that makes un-loadable models
> that have been developed with previous version of it.
> For example, it is not a problem when adding attributes to some
> elements of the metamodel, but when renaming or suppressing some, the
> saved resource model won't be able to load properly.
The options I suggest help deal with that. The resource will load and
the stuff that's not recognized is recorded "on the side".
> My goal is indeed to intercept in the loading process such event and
> post-process them to be able to load the model properly (with some
> know rules).
So what I suggested is a good match for that?
> As I said, we are not able to use plug-ins developed for that purpose
> right now (like Edapt or Sphinx), but we need to implement a quick
> solution.
You'll try what I suggested?
> By the way, is there any comparison of solutions like Edapt or Sphinx
> or others available?
Not that I know of no...
> Regards,
> Pascal
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02206 seconds
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
