Home » Eclipse Projects » Equinox » Pointers to enumerated technologies
| Pointers to enumerated technologies [message #1543] |
Fri, 21 February 2003 18:10  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello,
In the previous posts, several "component" technologies have been named:
OSGi, JMX, etc...
Although I knew the acronyms, I'm not familiar with the technology itself
(and guess I'm not the only one) so I'm looking for introduction documents
as well as comparison documents.
Thanks
PaScaL
|
|
|
| Re: Pointers to enumerated technologies [message #1573 is a reply to message #1543] |
Sat, 22 February 2003 20:01  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: joerg.schaible.web.de
Hello,
> In the previous posts, several "component" technologies have been named:
> OSGi, JMX, etc...
are you aware of the Avalon Projekt at Jakarta
(http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon)? The Avalon framework itself offers a
component model and has a basic infrastructure for component design. On top
of that, there are several management container implementations (Fortress,
Phoenix, Merlin) with different complexity supporting enhanced life-cycle
models, deployment, management extensions, etc.
Some well known application use this model like James and Cocoon.
The docs are currently a little out-of-date, but the commiters are creating
a new release currently ... best to talk to them on the mailing list.
Just my 2c
Regards,
J
|
|
| |
| Re: Pointers to enumerated technologies [message #9009 is a reply to message #1573] |
Thu, 06 March 2003 17:05 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I knew the name, but that's all.
I'd be very interested in knowing how and where this model can help us.
Could you tell us more?
Thx
PaScaL
"Joerg R. Schaible" <joerg.schaible@web.de> wrote in message
news:b394rv$ip4$1@rogue.oti.com...
> Hello,
>
> > In the previous posts, several "component" technologies have been named:
> > OSGi, JMX, etc...
>
> are you aware of the Avalon Projekt at Jakarta
> (http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon)? The Avalon framework itself offers a
> component model and has a basic infrastructure for component design. On
top
> of that, there are several management container implementations (Fortress,
> Phoenix, Merlin) with different complexity supporting enhanced life-cycle
> models, deployment, management extensions, etc.
>
> Some well known application use this model like James and Cocoon.
>
> The docs are currently a little out-of-date, but the commiters are
creating
> a new release currently ... best to talk to them on the mailing list.
>
> Just my 2c
>
> Regards,
> J
|
|
|
| Re: Pointers to enumerated technologies [message #10216 is a reply to message #1573] |
Fri, 07 March 2003 17:03 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
"Joerg R. Schaible" <joerg.schaible@web.de> writes:
> Hello,
>
> > In the previous posts, several "component" technologies have been named:
> > OSGi, JMX, etc...
>
> are you aware of the Avalon Projekt at Jakarta
> (http://jakarta.apache.org/avalon)?
There is also ObjectWeb's Fractal component model/framework which
might be interesting to look at:
http://www.objectweb.org/fractal
It's a pure runtime component model, supporting composition (including
sharing) and runtime reconfigurations. The reference implementation
(named Julia, ) is quite sophisticated and extensible, and there is an
XML-based ADL in the work. It's licensed under LGPL.
There was a workshop about it recently and one of the presentations
was about a comparaison between Fractal, Gravity (OSGi) and Avalon.
Slides availables at:
http://www.objectweb.org/fractal/current/workshop2003/avalon -fractal-gravity.pdf
Hope it helps.
--
Pierre-Charles David (pcdavid <at> tiscali <dot> fr)
Computer Science PhD Student, École des Mines de Nantes, France
Homepage: http://pcdavid.net
|
|
| | |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Jun 06 11:12:13 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.43045 seconds |
Home