| animation question [message #184714] |
Wed, 15 June 2005 19:18  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: stephen.perez.sbcglobal.net
I "borrowed" the "GraphAnimation" (CPL/EPL) class from the flow example. It
looks pretty self-contained, and useful, and I was wondering if anything
like it was available in GEF/Draw2D. Is there a better way to do that kind
of animation (the flow example was written a while ago and I am just
wondering if its techniques are up to date). Legally, what are the
ramifications of useing the GraphAnimation class in a commercial product?
Thanks,
Stephen
|
|
|
| Re: animation question [message #184857 is a reply to message #184714] |
Sun, 19 June 2005 06:21  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
No lawyers allowed in the newsgroup :-). Usually, you need to make sure
that whatever code you borrow and distribute, is publicly available in
source form. If you haven't changed the code, then that's pretty much for
free. This is a minimum, I am not suggesting that it is everything you need
to do. So if you have changed the code, and you are distributing the
binaries, you're probably doing something wrong.
See the main website for legal issues.
"Stephen Perez" <stephen.perez@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:d8puu3$l5r$1@news.eclipse.org...
>I "borrowed" the "GraphAnimation" (CPL/EPL) class from the flow example. It
> looks pretty self-contained, and useful, and I was wondering if anything
> like it was available in GEF/Draw2D. Is there a better way to do that kind
> of animation (the flow example was written a while ago and I am just
> wondering if its techniques are up to date). Legally, what are the
> ramifications of useing the GraphAnimation class in a commercial product?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03091 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
