|
|
|
Re: EPF output -> eclipse Help [message #17391 is a reply to message #17356] |
Sat, 09 September 2006 00:44 |
Peter Haumer Messages: 228 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
----- Forwarded by Peter Haumer on 09/08/2006 17:41 -----
From Jinhua Xi
Subject
Re: Fw: EPF output -> eclipse Help
Hi, Peter and Danny,
An easy way to extend the current publishing behavior is to add your own
publisher, the new publisher should extend the
org.eclipse.epf.publishing.ui.publusher extension point. In this extension
point, you need to specify your own Wizard class and publishign manager
class. The wizard class should extends
org.eclipse.epf.publishing.wizards.AbstractPublishWizard. The manager class
should extend the org.eclipse.epf.publishing.services.AbstractPublishManager
Once you have implemented the new features, you can consider merging the
changes into the EPF publisher.
Please let me know if you have any question.
Thanks,
Jinhua
--
Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.
____________________________________________________________ __
PETER HAUMER
IBM | Eclipse Process Framework Committer
____________________________________________________________ __
"danny" <danny.foncke@smals-mvm.be> wrote in message
news:edgqnb$kp6$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Not having any idea how much work is involved, I cannot make any hard
> promises.
> But the feature is really very useful to us, so I can defend spending some
> time on it.
> If you point me in the right direction I look into it
>
> Danny
>
>
> Peter Haumer wrote:
>> That would be really great. I think our vision document contains a
>> feature that allows publishing Cheat Sheets as well.
>>
>> We just have not found contributors for this, yet. Would you be
>> interested in contributing the implementation code for this? The Help
>> thing seems to be quite straightforward as you just need to generate XML
>> files for the help system instead of our tree browser. Also the Cheat
>> Sheets would be easy: parse a tool mentor and generate xml tags for each
>> section.
>>
|
|
|
|
|
Re: EPF output -> eclipse Help [message #565209 is a reply to message #17356] |
Sat, 09 September 2006 00:44 |
Peter Haumer Messages: 228 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
----- Forwarded by Peter Haumer on 09/08/2006 17:41 -----
From Jinhua Xi
Subject
Re: Fw: EPF output -> eclipse Help
Hi, Peter and Danny,
An easy way to extend the current publishing behavior is to add your own
publisher, the new publisher should extend the
org.eclipse.epf.publishing.ui.publusher extension point. In this extension
point, you need to specify your own Wizard class and publishign manager
class. The wizard class should extends
org.eclipse.epf.publishing.wizards.AbstractPublishWizard. The manager class
should extend the org.eclipse.epf.publishing.services.AbstractPublishManager
Once you have implemented the new features, you can consider merging the
changes into the EPF publisher.
Please let me know if you have any question.
Thanks,
Jinhua
--
Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.
____________________________________________________________ __
PETER HAUMER
IBM | Eclipse Process Framework Committer
____________________________________________________________ __
"danny" <danny.foncke@smals-mvm.be> wrote in message
news:edgqnb$kp6$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Not having any idea how much work is involved, I cannot make any hard
> promises.
> But the feature is really very useful to us, so I can defend spending some
> time on it.
> If you point me in the right direction I look into it
>
> Danny
>
>
> Peter Haumer wrote:
>> That would be really great. I think our vision document contains a
>> feature that allows publishing Cheat Sheets as well.
>>
>> We just have not found contributors for this, yet. Would you be
>> interested in contributing the implementation code for this? The Help
>> thing seems to be quite straightforward as you just need to generate XML
>> files for the help system instead of our tree browser. Also the Cheat
>> Sheets would be easy: parse a tool mentor and generate xml tags for each
>> section.
>>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.07192 seconds