| probably a bug [message #16971] |
Fri, 09 August 2002 08:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eddy.NOSPAMaxa.it
scenario:
project alpha with packages:
com.lilo.tools
com.lilo.tools.list
project beta with packages:
com.lilo.utility
com.lilo.utility.numbers
Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project alpha
(refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha already
exists and if you want to overwrite it.
The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from project
beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the complete
paths are different.
What happens, instead of this, is that packages in project alpha ARE
COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN.
Edoardo
|
|
|
| Re: probably a bug [message #17059 is a reply to message #16971] |
Fri, 09 August 2002 19:01  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com
That would be a good one to post to the eclipse.tools newsgroup. When you do
I have another "probably a bug" to tack on.
Bob
"Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message
news:aivv69$fe0$1@rogue.oti.com...
> scenario:
>
> project alpha with packages:
> com.lilo.tools
> com.lilo.tools.list
>
> project beta with packages:
> com.lilo.utility
> com.lilo.utility.numbers
>
>
> Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project alpha
> (refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha already
> exists and if you want to overwrite it.
>
> The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from project
> beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the complete
> paths are different.
>
> What happens, instead of this, is that packages in project alpha ARE
> COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN.
>
>
> Edoardo
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: probably a bug [message #17290 is a reply to message #17059] |
Wed, 14 August 2002 08:54 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eddy.NOSPAMaxa.it
Yes, just posted.. but seems that eclipse.tools still the wrong place where
you can advise someone about an important bug...
Only on http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/ you can talk about a bug.. (but it's
not a discussion group, isn't it?)
Edoardo
"Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:aj12tk$2n6$1@rogue.oti.com...
> That would be a good one to post to the eclipse.tools newsgroup. When you
do
> I have another "probably a bug" to tack on.
>
> Bob
>
> "Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message
> news:aivv69$fe0$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > scenario:
> >
> > project alpha with packages:
> > com.lilo.tools
> > com.lilo.tools.list
> >
> > project beta with packages:
> > com.lilo.utility
> > com.lilo.utility.numbers
> >
> >
> > Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project alpha
> > (refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha already
> > exists and if you want to overwrite it.
> >
> > The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from project
> > beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the
complete
> > paths are different.
> >
> > What happens, instead of this, is that packages in project alpha ARE
> > COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN.
> >
> >
> > Edoardo
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: probably a bug [message #17316 is a reply to message #17290] |
Wed, 14 August 2002 15:00 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: david_whiteman.oti.com
If you're pretty sure it's a bug, go ahead and put it on Bugzilla. The
worst they can tell you is that it's not a bug, or that it's a duplicate.
Plus, it's great for allowing others to append their thoughts or keep up
with a bug's progress - it's actually used as a discussion group for
specific bugs.
David
"Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message
news:ajd5fk$10n$1@rogue.oti.com...
> Yes, just posted.. but seems that eclipse.tools still the wrong place
where
> you can advise someone about an important bug...
>
> Only on http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/ you can talk about a bug.. (but it's
> not a discussion group, isn't it?)
> Edoardo
>
>
> "Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:aj12tk$2n6$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > That would be a good one to post to the eclipse.tools newsgroup. When
you
> do
> > I have another "probably a bug" to tack on.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > "Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message
> > news:aivv69$fe0$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > > scenario:
> > >
> > > project alpha with packages:
> > > com.lilo.tools
> > > com.lilo.tools.list
> > >
> > > project beta with packages:
> > > com.lilo.utility
> > > com.lilo.utility.numbers
> > >
> > >
> > > Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project
alpha
> > > (refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha
already
> > > exists and if you want to overwrite it.
> > >
> > > The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from
project
> > > beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the
> complete
> > > paths are different.
> > >
> > > What happens, instead of this, is that packages in project alpha ARE
> > > COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN.
> > >
> > >
> > > Edoardo
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: probably a bug [message #572654 is a reply to message #16971] |
Fri, 09 August 2002 19:01 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: bob.objfac.com
That would be a good one to post to the eclipse.tools newsgroup. When you do
I have another "probably a bug" to tack on.
Bob
"Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message
news:aivv69$fe0$1@rogue.oti.com...
> scenario:
>
> project alpha with packages:
> com.lilo.tools
> com.lilo.tools.list
>
> project beta with packages:
> com.lilo.utility
> com.lilo.utility.numbers
>
>
> Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project alpha
> (refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha already
> exists and if you want to overwrite it.
>
> The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from project
> beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the complete
> paths are different.
>
> What happens, instead of this, is that packages in project alpha ARE
> COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN.
>
>
> Edoardo
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: probably a bug [message #572967 is a reply to message #17059] |
Wed, 14 August 2002 08:54 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: eddy.NOSPAMaxa.it
Yes, just posted.. but seems that eclipse.tools still the wrong place where
you can advise someone about an important bug...
Only on http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/ you can talk about a bug.. (but it's
not a discussion group, isn't it?)
Edoardo
"Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:aj12tk$2n6$1@rogue.oti.com...
> That would be a good one to post to the eclipse.tools newsgroup. When you
do
> I have another "probably a bug" to tack on.
>
> Bob
>
> "Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message
> news:aivv69$fe0$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > scenario:
> >
> > project alpha with packages:
> > com.lilo.tools
> > com.lilo.tools.list
> >
> > project beta with packages:
> > com.lilo.utility
> > com.lilo.utility.numbers
> >
> >
> > Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project alpha
> > (refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha already
> > exists and if you want to overwrite it.
> >
> > The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from project
> > beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the
complete
> > paths are different.
> >
> > What happens, instead of this, is that packages in project alpha ARE
> > COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN.
> >
> >
> > Edoardo
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: probably a bug [message #573000 is a reply to message #17290] |
Wed, 14 August 2002 15:00 |
 David Whiteman
Messages: 166
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
If you're pretty sure it's a bug, go ahead and put it on Bugzilla. The
worst they can tell you is that it's not a bug, or that it's a duplicate.
Plus, it's great for allowing others to append their thoughts or keep up
with a bug's progress - it's actually used as a discussion group for
specific bugs.
David
"Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message
news:ajd5fk$10n$1@rogue.oti.com...
> Yes, just posted.. but seems that eclipse.tools still the wrong place
where
> you can advise someone about an important bug...
>
> Only on http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/ you can talk about a bug.. (but it's
> not a discussion group, isn't it?)
> Edoardo
>
>
> "Bob Foster" <bob@objfac.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:aj12tk$2n6$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > That would be a good one to post to the eclipse.tools newsgroup. When
you
> do
> > I have another "probably a bug" to tack on.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > "Eddy" <eddy@NOSPAMaxa.it> wrote in message
> > news:aivv69$fe0$1@rogue.oti.com...
> > > scenario:
> > >
> > > project alpha with packages:
> > > com.lilo.tools
> > > com.lilo.tools.list
> > >
> > > project beta with packages:
> > > com.lilo.utility
> > > com.lilo.utility.numbers
> > >
> > >
> > > Now, if you ask to move all packages from project beta to project
alpha
> > > (refactoring), Eclipse ask you that package com in project alpha
already
> > > exists and if you want to overwrite it.
> > >
> > > The normal behaviour in this case it would be that packages from
project
> > > beta fit together with the projects in project alpha because the
> complete
> > > paths are different.
> > >
> > > What happens, instead of this, is that packages in project alpha ARE
> > > COMPLETELY OVERWRITTEN.
> > >
> > >
> > > Edoardo
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03124 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
