| Linking to EPF Docs from External sources [message #16855] |
Sun, 13 August 2006 07:47  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: grenzi.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.com
Hello all--
I'll apologize in advance if this question is addressed in the docs or
otherwise self-obvious. I'd also like to take this opportunity to thank
the development team - this is an incredible product and we truly
appreciate the effort that's going into making it!
We're building out a new method plug-in (not extending OpenUP) and
publishing to an internal web site. We'd like to modify our templated MS
Project plan and have each task on it hyperlink to the appropriate docs on
the web.
With that in mind, are the URLs stable? What will cause the alphanumeric
suffix on these URLs to change?
http://blah/ff_capdev/tasks/arch_analysis,_jzrnQBEREduS-efuv cpHjg.html
Thanks,
gage
|
|
|
| Re: Linking to EPF Docs from External sources [message #16900 is a reply to message #16855] |
Mon, 14 August 2006 19:20  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
The published urls won't change unless you change the name or have a plug-in
'replace' elements using variability (contributes and extends does not
impact the URL).
The id part will only change if you delete the element and create a new one,
hence all references to such an element that you create in our editors
(which only use the id and not the name; and then substitute the id with the
URL at publication time) won't break at all.
--
Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.
____________________________________________________________ __
PETER HAUMER
IBM | Eclipse Process Framework Committer
____________________________________________________________ __
"Gage Renzi" <grenzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.com> wrote in message
news:04968fd4b2cb572575ef4810185b61d3$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hello all--
>
> I'll apologize in advance if this question is addressed in the docs or
> otherwise self-obvious. I'd also like to take this opportunity to thank
> the development team - this is an incredible product and we truly
> appreciate the effort that's going into making it!
>
> We're building out a new method plug-in (not extending OpenUP) and
> publishing to an internal web site. We'd like to modify our templated MS
> Project plan and have each task on it hyperlink to the appropriate docs on
> the web.
> With that in mind, are the URLs stable? What will cause the alphanumeric
> suffix on these URLs to change?
> http://blah/ff_capdev/tasks/arch_analysis,_jzrnQBEREduS-efuv cpHjg.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> gage
>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Linking to EPF Docs from External sources [message #564865 is a reply to message #16855] |
Mon, 14 August 2006 19:20 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
The published urls won't change unless you change the name or have a plug-in
'replace' elements using variability (contributes and extends does not
impact the URL).
The id part will only change if you delete the element and create a new one,
hence all references to such an element that you create in our editors
(which only use the id and not the name; and then substitute the id with the
URL at publication time) won't break at all.
--
Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.
____________________________________________________________ __
PETER HAUMER
IBM | Eclipse Process Framework Committer
____________________________________________________________ __
"Gage Renzi" <grenzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.com> wrote in message
news:04968fd4b2cb572575ef4810185b61d3$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hello all--
>
> I'll apologize in advance if this question is addressed in the docs or
> otherwise self-obvious. I'd also like to take this opportunity to thank
> the development team - this is an incredible product and we truly
> appreciate the effort that's going into making it!
>
> We're building out a new method plug-in (not extending OpenUP) and
> publishing to an internal web site. We'd like to modify our templated MS
> Project plan and have each task on it hyperlink to the appropriate docs on
> the web.
> With that in mind, are the URLs stable? What will cause the alphanumeric
> suffix on these URLs to change?
> http://blah/ff_capdev/tasks/arch_analysis,_jzrnQBEREduS-efuv cpHjg.html
>
> Thanks,
>
> gage
>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03724 seconds
Home