CompoundDirectedGraphLayout question [message #168961] |
Mon, 21 February 2005 03:08 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: yabing.crimsonlogic.com
Hi,
I need to layout a graph, which contains subgraphs. each subgraph is a
rectangle box containing some nodes. the subgraph is like a database
table. columns in the table are its nodes. and there are two types of
connection lines. one is between subgraphs, or between tables. the other
is between one node in one subgraph (one column in one table) and another
node in another subgraph (another column in another table). there is no
connection line within one subgraph or one table. in this case, can I use
CompoundDirectedGraphLayout to make a nice layout of the graph? if not, is
there any other way?
Thanks a lot!
Yabing
|
|
|
Re: CompoundDirectedGraphLayout question [message #169085 is a reply to message #168961] |
Mon, 21 February 2005 16:02 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
Wouldn't the columns of a table be layed out vertically top-to-bottom?
"yabing chen" <yabing@crimsonlogic.com> escreveu na mensagem
news:cvbjak$jkb$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi,
>
> I need to layout a graph, which contains subgraphs. each subgraph is a
> rectangle box containing some nodes. the subgraph is like a database
> table. columns in the table are its nodes. and there are two types of
> connection lines. one is between subgraphs, or between tables. the other
> is between one node in one subgraph (one column in one table) and another
> node in another subgraph (another column in another table). there is no
> connection line within one subgraph or one table. in this case, can I use
> CompoundDirectedGraphLayout to make a nice layout of the graph? if not, is
> there any other way?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Yabing
>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: CompoundDirectedGraphLayout question [message #169356 is a reply to message #169085] |
Wed, 23 February 2005 01:46 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: yabing.crimsonlogic.com
Thanks! got a reply finally.
yeah, the columns of a table is layed out vertically top-to-bottom, and
their location in the table shouldn't be changed in the layout. the
purpose of the layout is to change the location of all the tables to make
them and the connections between them and the connections between columns
presented nicely. can do it using CompoundDirectedGraphLayout?
Regards,
Yabing
Randy Hudson wrote:
> Wouldn't the columns of a table be layed out vertically top-to-bottom?
> "yabing chen" <yabing@crimsonlogic.com> escreveu na mensagem
> news:cvbjak$jkb$1@www.eclipse.org...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to layout a graph, which contains subgraphs. each subgraph is a
>> rectangle box containing some nodes. the subgraph is like a database
>> table. columns in the table are its nodes. and there are two types of
>> connection lines. one is between subgraphs, or between tables. the other
>> is between one node in one subgraph (one column in one table) and another
>> node in another subgraph (another column in another table). there is no
>> connection line within one subgraph or one table. in this case, can I use
>> CompoundDirectedGraphLayout to make a nice layout of the graph? if not, is
>> there any other way?
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>> Yabing
>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
Re: CompoundDirectedGraphLayout question [message #169450 is a reply to message #169356] |
Wed, 23 February 2005 15:23 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
Probably so.
"yabing chen" <yabing@crimsonlogic.com> escreveu na mensagem
news:cvgn92$8pr$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Thanks! got a reply finally.
>
> yeah, the columns of a table is layed out vertically top-to-bottom, and
> their location in the table shouldn't be changed in the layout. the
> purpose of the layout is to change the location of all the tables to make
> them and the connections between them and the connections between columns
> presented nicely. can do it using CompoundDirectedGraphLayout?
>
> Regards,
> Yabing
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03224 seconds