| JDTCompilerAdapter [message #167890] |
Mon, 28 August 2006 14:09  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: chadmichaeldavis.gmail.com
I am reading the Oreilly Eclipse book, by STeve Holzner, and he has the
following compiler added to an ant build, though he doesn't say why to
use it.
<property name="build.compiler"
value="org.eclipse.jdt.core.JDTCompilerAdapter"/>
1) I assume this makes ant use the built in compiler; is this correct?
2) Does this allow eclipse to become aware of project structure while
you use your ant build?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: JDTCompilerAdapter [message #167927 is a reply to message #167919] |
Mon, 28 August 2006 15:19  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: chadmichaeldavis.gmail.com
Olivier Thomann wrote:
> chad a écrit :
>> I mean that Eclipse must somehow become aware of a project's structure
>> in order to provide such functionality as "Open Declaration",
>> "Refactor", etc. Normally, when an ant build is run, Eclipse doesn't
>> seem to gain this information. It seems that it only does this when
>> it uses its own compiler.
> Eclipse doesn't use an ant script to compile the source of a project in
> general. It has its own java builder.
>
>> ALSO, you mention that the Eclipse compiler must be on the path? How
>> could the Eclipse compiler not be in the classpath already?
> It looks like you are confusing two things. Ant scripts and builder in
> Eclipse. If you are inside Eclipse, you should simply use the Java builder.
> If you are outside of Eclipse or want to run an ant script using the
> Eclipse compiler, then you can use the property that you gave.
>
> HTH,
> --
> Olivier
I understand the difference between the ant script and the internal
builder. The build for the project that I am working on is much too
complex to use the internal builder. So, I need to use the ant build.
Eclipse provides tools to use this from within Eclipse. But if i forgo
the internal builder, how does eclipse become aware of the project
structure in order to provide the extra functions it has?
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.49693 seconds
Home