Eclipse Community Forums: Newcomers » why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'?

Home » Newcomers » Newcomers » why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'?

why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161390]

Tue, 18 July 2006 07:25

Eclipse User

When i use cvs commit,i found Eclipse3.2 don't has 'override and commit',
but Eclipse 3.1 has.
why?this function is very useful for me.

thanks.

Re: why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161438 is a reply to message #161390]

Tue, 18 July 2006 10:53

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: hendrik_maryns.despammed.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dato schreef:
> When i use cvs commit,i found Eclipse3.2 don't has 'override and commit',
> but Eclipse 3.1 has.
> why?this function is very useful for me.

It is only there in the Synchronize perspective.

H.

- --
Hendrik Maryns

==================
http://aouw.org
Ask smart questions, get good answers:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEvPYGe+7xMGD3itQRAnJ1AJwJwucb3orAW7TTAy/DEIfuHo+osQCf XTTR
oymsdo1VHs3R62pdlYfgyqg=
=hq0O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161526 is a reply to message #161438]

Tue, 18 July 2006 20:37

Eclipse User

Hendrik Maryns wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

> Dato schreef:
>> When i use cvs commit,i found Eclipse3.2 don't has 'override and commit',
>> but Eclipse 3.1 has.
>> why?this function is very useful for me.

> It is only there in the Synchronize perspective.

> H.

> - --
> Hendrik Maryns

in the Synchronize perspective of ver3.2 has 'override and update',but not
has 'override and commit',
as i know ver3.1 has both 'override and commit' and 'override and commit'.

thanks.

Re: why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161551 is a reply to message #161526]

Wed, 19 July 2006 05:50

Eclipse User

Dato wrote:

> Hendrik Maryns wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>> Dato schreef:
>>
>>> When i use cvs commit,i found Eclipse3.2 don't has 'override and
>>> commit',
>>> but Eclipse 3.1 has.
>>> why?this function is very useful for me.
>>
>
>> It is only there in the Synchronize perspective.
>
>
>> H.
>
>
>> - --
>> Hendrik Maryns
>
>
> in the Synchronize perspective of ver3.2 has 'override and update',but
> not has 'override and commit',
> as i know ver3.1 has both 'override and commit' and 'override and
> commit'.

Works for me. Note that the 'override and commit' is only available in
the incoming mode or when there are conflicts.

Dani

>
> thanks.
>

Re: why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161575 is a reply to message #161551]

Wed, 19 July 2006 07:45

Eclipse User

Daniel Megert wrote:

> Dato wrote:

>> Hendrik Maryns wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>> Dato schreef:
>>>
>>>> When i use cvs commit,i found Eclipse3.2 don't has 'override and
>>>> commit',
>>>> but Eclipse 3.1 has.
>>>> why?this function is very useful for me.
>>>
>>
>>> It is only there in the Synchronize perspective.
>>
>>
>>> H.
>>
>>
>>> - --
>>> Hendrik Maryns
>>
>>
>> in the Synchronize perspective of ver3.2 has 'override and update',but
>> not has 'override and commit',
>> as i know ver3.1 has both 'override and commit' and 'override and
>> commit'.

> Works for me. Note that the 'override and commit' is only available in
> the incoming mode or when there are conflicts.

> Dani

my file has a red icon(conflict),but don't have a 'override and commit'
function.
you can see my print-screen:

Eclipse 3.1: http://www.zhxi.com/problem-eclipse-3.1.gif

Eclipse 3.2: http://www.zhxi.com/problem-eclipse-3.2.gif

thanks :D

Re: why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161599 is a reply to message #161390]

Wed, 19 July 2006 08:19

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: markus.milleder.generali.at

Dato wrote:

> When i use cvs commit,i found Eclipse3.2 don't has 'override and commit',
> but Eclipse 3.1 has.
> why?this function is very useful for me.

> thanks.

Because "Mark as Merged", then "Commit", has the same effect ?

HTH,
Markus

Re: why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161690 is a reply to message #161575]

Wed, 19 July 2006 09:01

Eclipse User

Dato wrote:

> Daniel Megert wrote:
>
>> Dato wrote:
>
>
>>> Hendrik Maryns wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dato schreef:
>>>>
>>>>> When i use cvs commit,i found Eclipse3.2 don't has 'override and
>>>>> commit',
>>>>> but Eclipse 3.1 has.
>>>>> why?this function is very useful for me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> It is only there in the Synchronize perspective.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> H.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> - --
>>>> Hendrik Maryns
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> in the Synchronize perspective of ver3.2 has 'override and
>>> update',but not has 'override and commit',
>>> as i know ver3.1 has both 'override and commit' and 'override and
>>> commit'.
>>
>
>> Works for me. Note that the 'override and commit' is only available
>> in the incoming mode or when there are conflicts.
>
>
>> Dani
>
>
> my file has a red icon(conflict),but don't have a 'override and
> commit' function.
> you can see my print-screen:
>
> Eclipse 3.1: http://www.zhxi.com/problem-eclipse-3.1.gif
>
> Eclipse 3.2: http://www.zhxi.com/problem-eclipse-3.2.gif

Ah, I see now: in 3.1 you used the normal (and only available)
synchronize style and now in 3.2 you are using the model based version
which seems to lack this feature. I suggest you file a bug against
Platform Team.
If you need the 'Override and Commit' feature badly you can disable the
usage of models in the Synchronize view.

Dani

>
> thanks :D
>
>
>

Re: why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161691 is a reply to message #161690]

Wed, 19 July 2006 10:05

Eclipse User

Daniel Megert wrote:

> Dato wrote:

>> Daniel Megert wrote:
>>
>>> Dato wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Hendrik Maryns wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Dato schreef:
>>>>>
>>>>>> When i use cvs commit,i found Eclipse3.2 don't has 'override and
>>>>>> commit',
>>>>>> but Eclipse 3.1 has.
>>>>>> why?this function is very useful for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It is only there in the Synchronize perspective.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> H.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> - --
>>>>> Hendrik Maryns
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> in the Synchronize perspective of ver3.2 has 'override and
>>>> update',but not has 'override and commit',
>>>> as i know ver3.1 has both 'override and commit' and 'override and
>>>> commit'.
>>>
>>
>>> Works for me. Note that the 'override and commit' is only available
>>> in the incoming mode or when there are conflicts.
>>
>>
>>> Dani
>>
>>
>> my file has a red icon(conflict),but don't have a 'override and
>> commit' function.
>> you can see my print-screen:
>>
>> Eclipse 3.1: http://www.zhxi.com/problem-eclipse-3.1.gif
>>
>> Eclipse 3.2: http://www.zhxi.com/problem-eclipse-3.2.gif

> Ah, I see now: in 3.1 you used the normal (and only available)
> synchronize style and now in 3.2 you are using the model based version
> which seems to lack this feature. I suggest you file a bug against
> Platform Team.
> If you need the 'Override and Commit' feature badly you can disable the
> usage of models in the Synchronize view.

> Dani

>>
>> thanks :D
>>
>>
>>

thank you ,Dani.
i think you are right.
btw,how to disable the usage of models?
thank you again. :D

Re: why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161692 is a reply to message #161691]

Wed, 19 July 2006 11:53

Eclipse User

Dato wrote:

> Daniel Megert wrote:
>
>> Dato wrote:
>
>
>>> Daniel Megert wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dato wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Hendrik Maryns wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dato schreef:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When i use cvs commit,i found Eclipse3.2 don't has 'override and
>>>>>>> commit',
>>>>>>> but Eclipse 3.1 has.
>>>>>>> why?this function is very useful for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> It is only there in the Synchronize perspective.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> H.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> - --
>>>>>> Hendrik Maryns
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> in the Synchronize perspective of ver3.2 has 'override and
>>>>> update',but not has 'override and commit',
>>>>> as i know ver3.1 has both 'override and commit' and 'override and
>>>>> commit'.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Works for me. Note that the 'override and commit' is only available
>>>> in the incoming mode or when there are conflicts.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dani
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> my file has a red icon(conflict),but don't have a 'override and
>>> commit' function.
>>> you can see my print-screen:
>>>
>>> Eclipse 3.1: http://www.zhxi.com/problem-eclipse-3.1.gif
>>>
>>> Eclipse 3.2: http://www.zhxi.com/problem-eclipse-3.2.gif
>>
>
>> Ah, I see now: in 3.1 you used the normal (and only available)
>> synchronize style and now in 3.2 you are using the model based
>> version which seems to lack this feature. I suggest you file a bug
>> against Platform Team.
>> If you need the 'Override and Commit' feature badly you can disable
>> the usage of models in the Synchronize view.
>
>
>> Dani
>
>
>>>
>>> thanks :D
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> thank you ,Dani.
> i think you are right.
> btw,how to disable the usage of models? thank you again. :D

Open the preferences via Synchronize view's view menu (the triangle in
the upper right) and then switch to the 'CVS' tab and disable 'Allow
models...'.

Dani

>
>

Re: why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161715 is a reply to message #161690]

Wed, 19 July 2006 13:54

Eclipse User

Daniel Megert wrote:
> Dato wrote:
>> Daniel Megert wrote:
>> my file has a red icon(conflict),but don't have a 'override and
>> commit' function.
>> you can see my print-screen:
>>
>> Eclipse 3.1: http://www.zhxi.com/problem-eclipse-3.1.gif
>>
>> Eclipse 3.2: http://www.zhxi.com/problem-eclipse-3.2.gif
>
>
> Ah, I see now: in 3.1 you used the normal (and only available)
> synchronize style and now in 3.2 you are using the model based version
> which seems to lack this feature. I suggest you file a bug against
> Platform Team.
> If you need the 'Override and Commit' feature badly you can disable the
> usage of models in the Synchronize view.

Can you elaborate on "model based version"? (Even just a pointer to a
doc would be appreciated.) I'm trying to understand how an
"implementation detail" resulted in a change at the user visibility
level. This, together with the totally overused word "model" (IMHO) has
my curiosity up.

--
RDS

Randy D. Smith randy (dot) d (dot) smith (at) intel (dot) com
Eclipse TPTP Committer, Platform Proj (data collection/agent controller)

Re: why 3.2 not has 'override and commit'? [message #161743 is a reply to message #161715]

Wed, 19 July 2006 17:27

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: john.eclipsefaq.org

Randy D. Smith wrote:
> Can you elaborate on "model based version"? (Even just a pointer to a
> doc would be appreciated.) I'm trying to understand how an
> "implementation detail" resulted in a change at the user visibility
> level. This, together with the totally overused word "model" (IMHO) has
> my curiosity up.
>

Yes, it's certainly an overused term. In this context it means some
logical domain model built on top of the platform resource model. For
example, JDT has a model of projects, source foldes, package fragment
roots, packages, compilation units, etc, built on top of the "physical"
resource model of projects, folders, and files. Here is a link to the
wiki page on this subject:

http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Team_Logical_Model_Support
--

Previous Topic:	Extending the existing Register view in Eclipse
Next Topic:	PreferenceStore

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Mon May 12 01:40:27 EDT 2025

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter