Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » Newbie: 3rd Party Plug-ins WTP1
Newbie: 3rd Party Plug-ins WTP1 [message #161324] Tue, 21 February 2006 04:58 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Hi IBM Gurus,

I have problems with restrictions defined in plug-ins (e.g. Apache libs)
provided by WTP 1.0. And current WTP 1.0 approach for using plug-ins with
3rd party code breaks existing functionality (in my environment).
Are there some known work arounds?

Can 3rd party plug-ins provided by TWO updated to let access all packages?
Would it be bug or feature request?


Error description:
Severity Description Resource In Folder Location Creation Time Id
2 Access restriction: The type DocumentBuilder is not accessible due to
restriction on required library
D:\eclipse3.1.1\WTP1\eclipse\plugins\org.apache.xerces_2.7.0 \xml-apis.jar
<Some>Handler.java com.<my company>/model/uml/util/extensions line 51
Antradienis, 2006, Vasario 21 11.45.31 12176

Thanks,
Pranas
Re: Newbie: 3rd Party Plug-ins WTP1 [message #161652 is a reply to message #161324] Wed, 22 February 2006 12:55 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:58:17 -0500, Pranas <pranas.baliuka@cablenet.lt> wrote:

> Hi *WTP* Gurus,
>
> I have problems with restrictions defined in plug-ins (e.g. Apache libs)
> provided by WTP 1.0. And current WTP 1.0 approach for using plug-ins with
> 3rd party code breaks existing functionality (in my environment).
> Are there some known work arounds?

I believe there are some preferences that let you control if this is an
error or warning? Otherwise, you'd have to hand-hack the manifest.mf file,
in the plugin, until fixed.

>
> Can 3rd party plug-ins provided by TWO updated to let access all packages?
> Would it be bug or feature request?
>


Kind of a bug, kind of a feature reqquest (I'd suggest opening as bug).
By default, it is the Eclipse Convention to "export"
*everything*, and mark it as "x-internal" if not really intended to
be used by clients.
The "feature request" part is that we have not really considered doing
this "x-internal" part for 3rd party code, but its a reasonable request.

Thanks.
Previous Topic:Missing jars in M20602141429
Next Topic:xml parsing innovation
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Apr 15 05:31:50 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03217 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top