| PageBookView in v1.0? [message #14784] |
Fri, 30 March 2007 01:00  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mattp.fast.fujitsu.com.au
Hi,
Can I ask if the draft plan for 1.0 can be considered an exhaustive list of
API that will definitely be in the release? For instance are there plans for
things like PageBookViews, WorkbenchAdapters etc. or should I assume that
anything not listed in the plan falls into the out of scope/community
involvement desirable categories?
Further ahead, are there any plans for some of the higher level ui
components to be ported, e.g. org.eclipse.jface.text, the console, eclipse
forms etc?
We're currently using eclipse for several projects but a decision has been
made that at least one of the products is to be moved to a web based/AJAX
style front-end. Obviously we'd like to minimise the work involved and
continue using eclipse if at all possible and RAP seems like it could be the
way to go.
How far do you see RAP going? Are there portions of eclipse that it will
definitely never try to reproduce?
Cheers,
Matt
|
|
|
| Re: PageBookView in v1.0? [message #15148 is a reply to message #14784] |
Sat, 31 March 2007 06:39  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: jkrause.innoopract.com
Hi Matt,
The draft plan is not an exhaustive list, and it is likely to change,
too. We are expanding the team and we are in the process of redefining
the plan in some areas. But we will need another week or so.
You will receive a detailed answer soon.
Jochen
Matt Purvis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I ask if the draft plan for 1.0 can be considered an exhaustive list of
> API that will definitely be in the release? For instance are there plans for
> things like PageBookViews, WorkbenchAdapters etc. or should I assume that
> anything not listed in the plan falls into the out of scope/community
> involvement desirable categories?
>
> Further ahead, are there any plans for some of the higher level ui
> components to be ported, e.g. org.eclipse.jface.text, the console, eclipse
> forms etc?
>
> We're currently using eclipse for several projects but a decision has been
> made that at least one of the products is to be moved to a web based/AJAX
> style front-end. Obviously we'd like to minimise the work involved and
> continue using eclipse if at all possible and RAP seems like it could be the
> way to go.
>
> How far do you see RAP going? Are there portions of eclipse that it will
> definitely never try to reproduce?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matt
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: PageBookView in v1.0? [message #15309 is a reply to message #15148] |
Mon, 02 April 2007 23:57 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mattp.fast.fujitsu.com.au
Thanks Jochen, I look forward to reading the plan and appreciate all the
work you guys have put in already.
Cheers,
Matt
"Jochen Krause" <jkrause@innoopract.com> wrote in message
news:eukvnl$lv9$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi Matt,
>
> The draft plan is not an exhaustive list, and it is likely to change, too.
> We are expanding the team and we are in the process of redefining the plan
> in some areas. But we will need another week or so.
>
> You will receive a detailed answer soon.
>
> Jochen
>
>
> Matt Purvis wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can I ask if the draft plan for 1.0 can be considered an exhaustive list
>> of API that will definitely be in the release? For instance are there
>> plans for things like PageBookViews, WorkbenchAdapters etc. or should I
>> assume that anything not listed in the plan falls into the out of
>> scope/community involvement desirable categories?
>>
>> Further ahead, are there any plans for some of the higher level ui
>> components to be ported, e.g. org.eclipse.jface.text, the console,
>> eclipse forms etc?
>>
>> We're currently using eclipse for several projects but a decision has
>> been made that at least one of the products is to be moved to a web
>> based/AJAX style front-end. Obviously we'd like to minimise the work
>> involved and continue using eclipse if at all possible and RAP seems like
>> it could be the way to go.
>>
>> How far do you see RAP going? Are there portions of eclipse that it will
>> definitely never try to reproduce?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Matt
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02904 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
