| Navigable associations [message #14701] |
Mon, 16 March 2009 11:58  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hello,
It seems Tigerstripe requires at least one end of an association to be
navigable.
However, when both ends are never read locally, this error does not show
up.
If these wranings are suppressed (@SuppressWarnings("unused")), then the
error then shows up.
Strange.
Best regards,
Marc
|
|
|
| Re: Navigable associations [message #14732 is a reply to message #14701] |
Thu, 19 March 2009 19:58  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Marc,
Well we didn't want to enforce the need for navigability of the
associations.
Yet I believe we made it so that the dialogs/editors would kind of "gently
force you to have at least one of ends navigable". We found that to be a
nice usability feature.
It seems however that it is a bit confusing, so maybe worth capturing as a
bugzilla.
Thanks,
Eric
On 3/16/09 8:58 AM, in article
700e1b5bd66911677147a32ea98fcd52$1@www.eclipse.org, "Marc FLAUW"
<marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems Tigerstripe requires at least one end of an association to be
> navigable.
>
> However, when both ends are never read locally, this error does not show
> up.
> If these wranings are suppressed (@SuppressWarnings("unused")), then the
> error then shows up.
>
> Strange.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
|
|
|
| Re: Navigable associations [message #564507 is a reply to message #14701] |
Thu, 19 March 2009 19:58 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Marc,
Well we didn't want to enforce the need for navigability of the
associations.
Yet I believe we made it so that the dialogs/editors would kind of "gently
force you to have at least one of ends navigable". We found that to be a
nice usability feature.
It seems however that it is a bit confusing, so maybe worth capturing as a
bugzilla.
Thanks,
Eric
On 3/16/09 8:58 AM, in article
700e1b5bd66911677147a32ea98fcd52$1@www.eclipse.org, "Marc FLAUW"
<marc.flauw@hp.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems Tigerstripe requires at least one end of an association to be
> navigable.
>
> However, when both ends are never read locally, this error does not show
> up.
> If these wranings are suppressed (@SuppressWarnings("unused")), then the
> error then shows up.
>
> Strange.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marc
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02939 seconds
Home