|
|
|
|
|
Re: undock views/windows in R2 ? [message #14873 is a reply to message #14816] |
Fri, 02 August 2002 01:09 |
shmuel siegel Messages: 75 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
If you made the same comment in the CDT newsgroup, I would accept what you
say. I don't know why people ask java or SWT question in that newsgroup.
However, when the names seem like they mean something one doesn't bother to
read descriptions. Look at how many times you have needed to say the same
thing. It should be obvious that people think that technology is the basic
project and that tools are plugins or something like that. Would you be
happy reading a program that says:
while ( increasingIndex-- > zero) doSomething();
Just read the program, it's obvious what it is doing.
Case overstated to emphasize the point. Anyway, correct the newsgroup names
or put up with the endless stream of misplaced questions.
Shmuel
"Mark C. Chu-Carroll" <mcc@watson.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:aic40u$il0$1@rogue.oti.com...
> On the one hand, it's true that the names are confusing. But
> on the other hand, how much time does it take to glance at the newsgroup
> descriptions on the eclipse website to see which one is the correct
> place for your post instead of just randomly guessing?
>
> I just tried checking how long it would take to open a web-browser, go
> to eclipse.org, click on "newsgroups" and see the descriptions. 18
> seconds.
>
> Is that *really* too much to ask?
>
>
> -Mark
>
>
> --
> Mark Craig Chu-Carroll, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
> *** The Stellation project: Advanced SCM for Collaboration
> *** http://www.eclipse.org/stellation
> *** Work Email: mcc@watson.ibm.com ------- Personal Email:
markcc@bestweb.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: undock views/windows in R2 ? [message #571634 is a reply to message #14816] |
Fri, 02 August 2002 01:09 |
shmuel siegel Messages: 75 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
If you made the same comment in the CDT newsgroup, I would accept what you
say. I don't know why people ask java or SWT question in that newsgroup.
However, when the names seem like they mean something one doesn't bother to
read descriptions. Look at how many times you have needed to say the same
thing. It should be obvious that people think that technology is the basic
project and that tools are plugins or something like that. Would you be
happy reading a program that says:
while ( increasingIndex-- > zero) doSomething();
Just read the program, it's obvious what it is doing.
Case overstated to emphasize the point. Anyway, correct the newsgroup names
or put up with the endless stream of misplaced questions.
Shmuel
"Mark C. Chu-Carroll" <mcc@watson.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:aic40u$il0$1@rogue.oti.com...
> On the one hand, it's true that the names are confusing. But
> on the other hand, how much time does it take to glance at the newsgroup
> descriptions on the eclipse website to see which one is the correct
> place for your post instead of just randomly guessing?
>
> I just tried checking how long it would take to open a web-browser, go
> to eclipse.org, click on "newsgroups" and see the descriptions. 18
> seconds.
>
> Is that *really* too much to ask?
>
>
> -Mark
>
>
> --
> Mark Craig Chu-Carroll, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
> *** The Stellation project: Advanced SCM for Collaboration
> *** http://www.eclipse.org/stellation
> *** Work Email: mcc@watson.ibm.com ------- Personal Email:
markcc@bestweb.net
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03610 seconds