| Tally the votes on project name [message #14397] |
Tue, 20 January 2004 22:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richardluong.msn.com
Project Name:
(votes) voters...
SolarEclipse:
(2) Igor M.*, Vasanth D.
Web Development Tools for Eclipse:
(3+1**) Chris L., Alex F., myself, Sjoerd L.
webdt:
(2) Matthew B., Adam F.
* - Igor also suggested TWINS as a potential name in the "Propose to
move to ObjectWeb" thread
** - Sjoerd had Web Development Tooling as one of his many name
suggestions in the ObjectWeb thread.
Not by a much of a lead, but it appears that Web Development Tools for
Eclipse is the "winner". Unless people want to continue to debate over
the name, can we close this issue?
In my eyes, I see Igor's, Chris' and Alex's votes having the extra
weight seeing as to how they all have pre-existing project codebases
that they *can* donate right away. Can we close this, and move on
before the everyone's enthusiasm dies out? Already the posts seem less
active.
Richard.
|
|
|
| Re: Tally the votes on project name [message #14426 is a reply to message #14397] |
Wed, 21 January 2004 03:44  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Richard Luong wrote:
> Project Name:
> (votes) voters...
>
> SolarEclipse:
> (2) Igor M.*, Vasanth D.
> Web Development Tools for Eclipse:
> (3+1**) Chris L., Alex F., myself, Sjoerd L.
> webdt:
> (2) Matthew B., Adam F.
>
> * - Igor also suggested TWINS as a potential name in the "Propose to
> move to ObjectWeb" thread
> ** - Sjoerd had Web Development Tooling as one of his many name
> suggestions in the ObjectWeb thread.
>
> Not by a much of a lead, but it appears that Web Development Tools for
> Eclipse is the "winner". Unless people want to continue to debate over
> the name, can we close this issue?
>
> In my eyes, I see Igor's, Chris' and Alex's votes having the extra
> weight seeing as to how they all have pre-existing project codebases
> that they *can* donate right away. Can we close this, and move on
> before the everyone's enthusiasm dies out? Already the posts seem less
> active.
Seconded and I call question.
--
Alex
|
|
|
| Re: Tally the votes on project name [message #14455 is a reply to message #14397] |
Wed, 21 January 2004 05:44 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Richard Luong wrote:
> Project Name:
> (votes) voters...
>
> SolarEclipse:
> (2) Igor M.*, Vasanth D.
> Web Development Tools for Eclipse:
> (3+1**) Chris L., Alex F., myself, Sjoerd L.
> webdt:
> (2) Matthew B., Adam F.
>
> * - Igor also suggested TWINS as a potential name in the "Propose to
> move to ObjectWeb" thread
> ** - Sjoerd had Web Development Tooling as one of his many name
> suggestions in the ObjectWeb thread.
>
> Not by a much of a lead, but it appears that Web Development Tools for
> Eclipse is the "winner". Unless people want to continue to debate over
> the name, can we close this issue?
Yes please :-)
Igor, I understand that you're not really in love with "Web Development
Tools for Eclipse" (WDTE). Would you still be okay contributing to the
project if we choose this path and not go with SolarEclipse?
There is also room for compromise IMO: SolarEclipse could live on as a
project providing JSP/J2EE tooling built on top of WDTE, for example. What
do you think?
Cheers,
Chris
--
/=/ cmlenz at gmx.de
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Tally the votes on project name [message #14989 is a reply to message #14426] |
Thu, 22 January 2004 11:28 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: mbrozowski.nc.rr.com
I'm in agreement. WDTE it is... Can we start coding now?
Matt Brozowski
"Alex.Fitzpatrick" <alex.fitzpatrick@cognos.com> wrote in message
news:bule2k$1kc$1@eclipse.org...
> Richard Luong wrote:
> > Project Name:
> > (votes) voters...
> >
> > SolarEclipse:
> > (2) Igor M.*, Vasanth D.
> > Web Development Tools for Eclipse:
> > (3+1**) Chris L., Alex F., myself, Sjoerd L.
> > webdt:
> > (2) Matthew B., Adam F.
> >
> > * - Igor also suggested TWINS as a potential name in the "Propose to
> > move to ObjectWeb" thread
> > ** - Sjoerd had Web Development Tooling as one of his many name
> > suggestions in the ObjectWeb thread.
> >
> > Not by a much of a lead, but it appears that Web Development Tools for
> > Eclipse is the "winner". Unless people want to continue to debate over
> > the name, can we close this issue?
> >
> > In my eyes, I see Igor's, Chris' and Alex's votes having the extra
> > weight seeing as to how they all have pre-existing project codebases
> > that they *can* donate right away. Can we close this, and move on
> > before the everyone's enthusiasm dies out? Already the posts seem less
> > active.
>
> Seconded and I call question.
>
> --
> Alex
|
|
|
|
| Re: Tally the votes on project name [message #16134 is a reply to message #14602] |
Thu, 29 January 2004 09:04 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Actually if Sun get their way and the Eclipse name is changed we don't want
to deliberately rile the Sun guys with Eclipse-like/related names. After all
we all want the same things really.
What about plain WDT, that way we have no dependencies on the current name
of the platform? Program to an interface, implementing sub-projects can add
on the "E" if they want.
Troll.
Troll.
"Igor Malinin" <igor@widespace.ee> wrote in message
news:400EE5A7.7010102@widespace.ee...
> Sjoerd van Leent wrote:
> > Maybe the name Luna is something which could be usable (with eclipse
still
> > embedded into the name), although I don't know any words which could be
> > abbreviated to Luna. Maybe Moon can be used instead of Luna, but I think
> > Luna is better.
>
> Both names are taken already... 3 years ago :)
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/luna/
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/moon/
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03761 seconds
Home