| Call hierarchy mislead [message #148728] |
Mon, 15 March 2004 12:10  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: arnout.standaert.n-o-s-p-a-m.cit.kuleuven.ac.be
Hi group,
I'm using build I20040226 currently for my development work (it seems
I20040310 has some serious issues with debugging, so I reverted). I
frequently use the Call Hierarchy command to check program flow.
Now, the problem: when a certain method A is mentioned in the javadoc
comments of another method B (for example, in a {@link} tag), then
Call Hierarchy interprets this as if method B actually calls method
A. This is, of course, incorrect.
Can anyone confirm this? Should I file a bug report for this?
Thanks in advance,
Wald
|
|
|
| Re: Call hierarchy mislead [message #148738 is a reply to message #148728] |
Mon, 15 March 2004 13:01  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: linnet.nospam.users.sourceforge.net
Hi Wald,
Yes please. I think this is a bug. I don't think it is interesting to
see references from documentation when following code flow. If that is
needed, the ordinary search should be used instead (which generates the
same result).
Please enter "[call hierarchy]" as part of the subject.
Thanks,
Jesper
Wald wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> I'm using build I20040226 currently for my development work (it seems
> I20040310 has some serious issues with debugging, so I reverted). I
> frequently use the Call Hierarchy command to check program flow.
>
> Now, the problem: when a certain method A is mentioned in the javadoc
> comments of another method B (for example, in a {@link} tag), then
> Call Hierarchy interprets this as if method B actually calls method
> A. This is, of course, incorrect.
>
> Can anyone confirm this? Should I file a bug report for this?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Wald
>
|
|
|
| Re: Call hierarchy mislead [message #148777 is a reply to message #148738] |
Mon, 15 March 2004 15:23 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: arnout.standaert.n-o_s-p-a-m.cit.kuleuven.ac.be
Jesper Kamstrup Linnet <linnet@nospam.users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi Wald,
>
> Yes please. I think this is a bug. I don't think it is interesting to
> see references from documentation when following code flow. If that is
> needed, the ordinary search should be used instead (which generates the
> same result).
>
> Please enter "[call hierarchy]" as part of the subject.
Filed bug number 54892.
Thanks for the response,
Wald
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03954 seconds
Home