Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » JavaScript JSDock provider
JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019566] Sat, 16 March 2013 01:49 Go to next message
Dawid Pakula is currently offline Dawid PakulaFriend
Messages: 200
Registered: March 2013
Senior Member
I'm looking for method to extend parser and/or AST nodes.

Or access into source code while inferencing (this is stupid I know).

It's required to add JSDuck support into JSDT (ExtJS and some other projects). Its possible without fork?

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019943 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019945 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019946 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019947 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019949 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019950 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019951 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019952 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019954 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019955 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019956 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019957 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019959 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019960 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019961 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019962 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019964 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019965 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019966 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019967 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019969 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019970 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019971 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019972 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019974 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019975 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019976 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019977 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019979 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019980 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019981 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019982 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019984 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019985 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019986 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019987 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019991 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019992 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019993 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019994 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019998 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1019999 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020000 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020001 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020005 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020006 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020007 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020008 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020012 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020013 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020014 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020015 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020019 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020020 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020021 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020022 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020026 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020027 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020028 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020029 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020033 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020034 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020035 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020036 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020040 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020041 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020042 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020043 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020047 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020048 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020049 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020050 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020054 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020055 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020056 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020057 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020061 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020062 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020063 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020064 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020068 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Check http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 for information on how to add an infer engine (yes, the AST gives you access to the code and the parser the comments) and how to contribute a provider to look up your documentation and format it for viewing.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020069 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020070 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020071 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020075 is a reply to message #1019566] Sun, 17 March 2013 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.
--
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP, IBM

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020154 is a reply to message #1020075] Sun, 17 March 2013 11:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dawid Pakula is currently offline Dawid PakulaFriend
Messages: 200
Registered: March 2013
Senior Member
Thank you I'll try to add a tranform JSDuck <-> JSDoc

BTW: Nice forum bug Wink

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020207 is a reply to message #1020154] Sun, 17 March 2013 15:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dawid Pakula is currently offline Dawid PakulaFriend
Messages: 200
Registered: March 2013
Senior Member
hmm, this is not what I'm lookin for.

I need access to all /** */ comments while infering (first comment in file with @class and other comments)

I any way to extend AST tree without forking?

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020402 is a reply to message #1019566] Mon, 18 March 2013 05:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Yes, check the slides of http://www.eclipsecon.org/2011/sessions/?page=sessions&id=2187 , although you can't change the actual parser without forking (JSDoc comments are the only ones stored on the AST directly). You'll want to add an infer engine that processes your JSDuck comments as well as a documentation provider to help show them to the user.

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020403 is a reply to message #1020402] Mon, 18 March 2013 05:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nitin Dahyabhai is currently offline Nitin DahyabhaiFriend
Messages: 2728
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Ugh, funny business with the web frontend.

No, the AST isn't extensible, but comments that look like /**..*/ should be stored as JSDoc (although not understood well by the JSDoc parser) and at least let you tell where in the buffer the comment is stored.

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1020546 is a reply to message #1019566] Mon, 18 March 2013 12:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dawid Pakula is currently offline Dawid PakulaFriend
Messages: 200
Registered: March 2013
Senior Member
Thanks, I'm still looking for a solution.

First comment in file (most important for me) is not accesible while visit(JsDoc) Wink

Report message to a moderator

Re: JavaScript JSDock provider [message #1032899 is a reply to message #1019566] Wed, 03 April 2013 15:36 Go to previous message
Dawid Pakula is currently offline Dawid PakulaFriend
Messages: 200
Registered: March 2013
Senior Member
If I good understand, I always have to access into file contents to read each (or just first) comment ?

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:JSDT Arrays Code Completion
Next Topic:Remote Machine Exploded Deployment in Weblogic
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Mon Sep 26 02:01:25 GMT 2016

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.09479 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software