| Graphical comparison specification note [message #1015366] |
Thu, 28 February 2013 06:17  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
going through the specification, a little thing came to my mind and I think that i don't see this use case mentioned.
In case of a quite constrained layout that doesn't allow superposition, if two different nodes are added at the same place, shouldn't we have a conflict?
More generally, I think that performing a check on position with the layout would be great, after merge, the diagram should be "layout-valid".
Unfortunately, technically, I'm not sure that it will easy to do :s
Did you already mention about this use case and I missed it? If yes, can you point me to the correct place please.
Regards,
[Updated on: Thu, 28 February 2013 07:05] by Moderator |
|
|
| Re: Graphical comparison specification note [message #1015489 is a reply to message #1015366] |
Thu, 28 February 2013 13:00  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback.
The generic core of EMF Compare will not detect conflict in case of superposition of graphical objects between two sides because it is a specific/business need.
But this core can be extended, adding your own post-processor. It allows you, for example, to create additional conflicts. In your case, they would reference the add or location/bounds changes on objects where bounds overlap.
Once these conflicts created, the user interface should be able to display automatically the conflicting decorators on each side.
Regards,
Cedric Notot
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.53348 seconds
Home