Eclipse Community Forums: TMF (Xtext) » Assignments and function output have same sintax

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » TMF (Xtext) » Assignments and function output have same sintax(non-LL(*) decision)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Assignments and function output have same sintax [message #985883]

Fri, 16 November 2012 14:51

Tommaso De Sica

Messages: 131
Registered: March 2012
Location: Italy

Senior Member

I've got a situation that can be summarized with this little code:

Instruction:
   EmptyInstruction | Assignment;

EmptyInstruction: ';';

Assignment:
   variable=[Variable]':='expression=Expression';' ;

Function:
   'FUNCTION' name=ID
   instructions+=Instruction*
   output=[Function]':='expression=Expression';' ;

I know where is the problem, but how can I resolve the non-LL decision?

Very thank you for help.

[Updated on: Fri, 16 November 2012 14:52]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Assignments and function output have same sintax [message #986163 is a reply to message #985883]

Mon, 19 November 2012 09:22

Boris Brodski

Messages: 111
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

I see no problem with this (Xtext 2.3.1). Enhanced with some more rules it works for me:

Grammar:

Model:
	(functions += Function)*;
	
Instruction:
   EmptyInstruction | Assignment;

EmptyInstruction: {EmptyInstruction} ';';

Assignment:
   variable=[Variable]':='expression=Expression';' ;

Function:
   'FUNCTION' name=ID
   vars += Variable*
   instructions+=Instruction*
   output=[Function]':='expression=Expression';' ;

Variable: name=ID ';';
Expression: value=INT | var=[Variable];

DSL:

FUNCTION a
  b;
  c;
  b := 1;
  c := b;
  a := c;

Report message to a moderator

Re: Assignments and function output have same sintax [message #986254 is a reply to message #986163]

Mon, 19 November 2012 16:22

Tommaso De Sica

Messages: 131
Registered: March 2012
Location: Italy

Senior Member

I solve with option

backtrack=true

UPDATE:
Problem comes out also in this situation:

RealValue:
INT '.' INT;

Array:
name=ID 'ARRAY' '[' initial=INT '..' final=INT ']' ';';

When, in my DSL, I try to write something like this:

v ARRAY [1..10];

I'll receive an error: after the '.' it wants an INT.

Very thank you!

[Updated on: Mon, 19 November 2012 16:43]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Assignments and function output have same sintax [message #986265 is a reply to message #986254]

Mon, 19 November 2012 16:41

Tommaso De Sica

Messages: 131
Registered: March 2012
Location: Italy

Senior Member

Problem comes out also in this situation:

RealValue:
INT '.' INT;

Array:
name=ID 'ARRAY' '[' initial=INT '..' final=INT ']' ';';

When, in my DSL, I try to write something like this:

v ARRAY [1..10];

I'll receive an error: after the '.' it wants an INT.

Very thank you!

Report message to a moderator

Re: Assignments and function output have same sintax [message #986266 is a reply to message #986254]

Mon, 19 November 2012 16:41

Tommaso De Sica

Messages: 131
Registered: March 2012
Location: Italy

Senior Member

Problem comes out also in this situation:

RealValue:
INT '.' INT;

Array:
name=ID 'ARRAY' '[' initial=INT '..' final=INT ']' ';';

When, in my DSL, I try to write something like this:

v ARRAY [1..10];

I'll receive an error: after the '.' it wants an INT.

Very thank you!

Report message to a moderator

Re: Assignments and function output have same sintax [message #986325 is a reply to message #986266]

Tue, 20 November 2012 00:36

Boris Brodski

Messages: 111
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

backtrack=true

is strongly discouraged. It suspends all those warnings, so you have no idea, something else is broken too.
Besides that, you have no control, which way the parse will take ignoring the warning. Consider using syntactic predicated '=>' instead.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Assignments and function output have same sintax [message #986358 is a reply to message #986325]

Tue, 20 November 2012 08:47

Tommaso De Sica

Messages: 131
Registered: March 2012
Location: Italy

Senior Member

Boris Brodski wrote on Tue, 20 November 2012 01:36

backtrack=true
is strongly discouraged. It suspends all those warnings, so you have no idea, something else is broken too.
Besides that, you have no control, which way the parse will take ignoring the warning. Consider using syntactic predicated '=>' instead.

Very thank you for suggest, I was able to disable the backtrack. For the moment it works fine.

Now I'm going to finish the grammar,
thanks!

Report message to a moderator

Re: Assignments and function output have same sintax [message #986612 is a reply to message #985883]

Wed, 21 November 2012 08:19

Tommaso De Sica

Messages: 131
Registered: March 2012
Location: Italy

Senior Member

Maybe solved.

[Updated on: Thu, 22 November 2012 09:58]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Assignments and function output have same sintax [message #987212 is a reply to message #986612]

Sat, 24 November 2012 14:27

Lorenzo Bettini

Messages: 1770
Registered: July 2009
Location: Firenze, Italy

Senior Member

Ciao Tommaso

as they already told you, stay away from backtrack=true :)

you can find an example expression language here

http://xsemantics.sourceforge.net/xsemantics-documentation/Expressions-example.html#Expressions

hope this helps
Lorenzo

On 11/21/2012 09:19 AM, Tommaso De Sica wrote:
> Similar problem that I can't solve:
>
>
> Expression:
> (expression=NumericExpression) | (expression=BoolExpr)
> ;
>
> BoolExpr returns BoolExpr:
> OrExpr;
>
> OrExpr returns BoolExpr:
> AndExpr ({Or.left=current} 'OR' right=AndExpr)*;
>
> AndExpr returns BoolExpr:
> PrimaryExpr ({And.left=current} 'AND' right=PrimaryExpr)*;
>
> PrimaryExpr returns BoolExpr:
> '(' BoolExpr ')' | BoolLiteral;
>
> BoolLiteral:
> ...
> ;
>
> NumericExpression returns IntegerExpression:
> Multiplication ({NumericExpression.left=current} ('+'|'-')
> right=Multiplication)*;
>
> Multiplication returns IntegerExpression:
> Pow ({Multiplication.left=current} ('*'|'/'|'MOD') right=Pow)*;
>
> Pow returns IntegerExpression:
> Primary ({Pow.left=current} '**' right=Primary)*;
>
> Primary returns IntegerExpression:
> NumberLiteral |
> '(' NumericExpression ')' |
> '-'NumberLiteral;
>
> NumberLiteral:
> ...;
>
> error is the same, but I can't understand how use => in this case.
> Someone can halp me? Very thank you!

--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net

HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it
TDD Book: https://leanpub.com/tdd-buildautomation-ci
Xtext Book: https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/implementing-domain-specific-languages-xtext-and-xtend-second-edition

Report message to a moderator