|
Re: [EMF Compare] what about cross-references of a merged eObject ? [message #137072 is a reply to message #137012] |
Tue, 09 June 2009 16:27 |
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010309000601020706030502
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Chetan,
This behavior is intentional. We don't copy cross references to non
existing objects (some people might want it, some others not as all use
cases don't apply to one case or the other).
If you copy the book, its reference towards an author is not copied
alongside it. If you then copy the author, the reference should be
restored as it should.
You can tweak this part of the merge by overriding the existing mergers
(see extension point org.eclipse.emf.compare.diff.mergerprovider ).
Laurent Goubet
Obeo
Chetan Kumar a
|
|
|
|
Re: [EMF Compare] what about cross-references of a merged eObject ? [message #621005 is a reply to message #137012] |
Tue, 09 June 2009 16:27 |
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010309000601020706030502
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Chetan,
This behavior is intentional. We don't copy cross references to non
existing objects (some people might want it, some others not as all use
cases don't apply to one case or the other).
If you copy the book, its reference towards an author is not copied
alongside it. If you then copy the author, the reference should be
restored as it should.
You can tweak this part of the merge by overriding the existing mergers
(see extension point org.eclipse.emf.compare.diff.mergerprovider ).
Laurent Goubet
Obeo
Chetan Kumar a
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04258 seconds