| What was the bug in the GEF logic example? [message #132016] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 15:06  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: hpoley.dds.nl
As far as I know I read something here about a bug in the GEF logic example,
but I can't find bugfix nor the reference back.
At least I've bumped into a thing where when you attach a second line to an
element the existing line disconnects and attaches itself to some fixed
coordinate. Is that the bug? And what was the fix?
Henk Poley <><
|
|
|
| Re: What was the bug in the GEF logic example? [message #132029 is a reply to message #132016] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 16:41  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
That bug was indeed fixed.
"Henk Poley" <hpoley@dds.nl> wrote in message
news:c802fj$ucg$1@eclipse.org...
> As far as I know I read something here about a bug in the GEF logic
example,
> but I can't find bugfix nor the reference back.
>
> At least I've bumped into a thing where when you attach a second line to
an
> element the existing line disconnects and attaches itself to some fixed
> coordinate. Is that the bug? And what was the fix?
>
> Henk Poley <><
|
|
|
| Re: What was the bug in the GEF logic example? [message #132040 is a reply to message #132029] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 16:04 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: hpoley.dds.nl
Whitney Sorenson wrote:
> "Henk Poley" <hpoley@dds.nl> wrote in message
>
>> As far as I know I read something here about a bug in the GEF logic
>> example, but I can't find bugfix nor the reference back.
>>
>> At least I've bumped into a thing where when you attach a second line to
>> an element the existing line disconnects and attaches itself to some
>> fixed coordinate. Is that the bug? And what was the fix?
>
> That bug was indeed fixed.
Thank you for mentioning, but..
1. Is that fixed version in GEF 2.1.2 ? (apparently last week is was not)
2. What was the fix?
Our plugin is heavily based on things we learned from the example, so...
Henk Poley <><
|
|
|
| Re: What was the bug in the GEF logic example? [message #132066 is a reply to message #132040] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 19:31 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
1. No, 2.1.2 was finalized a long time ago. As for 2.1.3, it was not one of
the two fixes to go into that either. Therefore, you will need to use a 3.0
build to see the fix.
2. I believe the fix was a change in the canExecute() method of
ConnectionCommand, though it might have included other classes.
"Henk Poley" <hpoley@dds.nl> wrote in message
news:c805sn$3g1$1@eclipse.org...
> Whitney Sorenson wrote:
>
> > "Henk Poley" <hpoley@dds.nl> wrote in message
> >
> >> As far as I know I read something here about a bug in the GEF logic
> >> example, but I can't find bugfix nor the reference back.
> >>
> >> At least I've bumped into a thing where when you attach a second line
to
> >> an element the existing line disconnects and attaches itself to some
> >> fixed coordinate. Is that the bug? And what was the fix?
> >
> > That bug was indeed fixed.
>
> Thank you for mentioning, but..
>
> 1. Is that fixed version in GEF 2.1.2 ? (apparently last week is was not)
> 2. What was the fix?
>
> Our plugin is heavily based on things we learned from the example, so...
>
> Henk Poley <><
|
|
|
| Re: What was the bug in the GEF logic example? [message #132078 is a reply to message #132066] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 19:04 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: hpoley.dds.nl
Whitney Sorenson wrote:
> "Henk Poley" <hpoley@dds.nl> wrote in message
>> Whitney Sorenson wrote:
>>> "Henk Poley" <hpoley@dds.nl> wrote in message
>>>
>>>> At least I've bumped into a thing where when you attach a second line
>>>> to an element the existing line disconnects and attaches itself to some
>>>> fixed coordinate. Is that the bug? And what was the fix?
>>>
>>> That bug was indeed fixed.
>>
>> 1. Is that fixed version in GEF 2.1.2 ? (apparently last week is was not)
>> 2. What was the fix?
>
> 1. No, 2.1.2 was finalized a long time ago. As for 2.1.3, it was not one
> of the two fixes to go into that either. Therefore, you will need to use a
> 3.0 build to see the fix.
> 2. I believe the fix was a change in the canExecute() method of
> ConnectionCommand, though it might have included other classes.
This last one seems to lead us in the right direction, nice for helping us.
btw, a searchable eclipse.tools.gef archive would be handy, but that's
off-topic...
Henk Poley <><
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03488 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
