Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » Get involved !? - In what ? a not existing project?
| Get involved !? - In what ? a not existing project? [message #11549] |
Thu, 11 December 2003 03:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: Berlitz.yahoo.com
Hello,
i read about the webtools project time ago, but i dont recognize any
movement here. Different from the VE tools project, where a lot of
movement is taken place, the webtools project seems to be dead.
Please correct me if i am wrong, but it seems J2EE and eclipse will not
come together.
I would be happy if somebody can correct me and looking forward to recieve
any posivite answer.
|
|
| |
| Re: Get involved !? - In what ? a not existing project? [message #11621 is a reply to message #11587] |
Thu, 11 December 2003 08:47  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: Berlitz.yahoo.com
Yes i understand. But when i am looking at the latest news (e.g. netbeans
will not work together with Eclipse, bea offers an own IDE,...) i am not
sure whether they get some of the big players on board.
Regarding the lomboz plugin, it forces me to use a directory structure,
which isn't that well organized.
Tom wrote:
> Your observations are correct to a certain extent. Very little
> movement-action here currently.
> According to some announcements in the past few weeks this is because
> they are still attempting to get some of the big players on board.
> Once that is complete the project should fire up.
> In the meantime I'm using the Lomboz plugins for J2EE.
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:45:07 +0000 (UTC), Berlitz@yahoo.com (Berlitz)
> wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >i read about the webtools project time ago, but i dont recognize any
> >movement here. Different from the VE tools project, where a lot of
> >movement is taken place, the webtools project seems to be dead.
> >
> >Please correct me if i am wrong, but it seems J2EE and eclipse will not
> >come together.
> >I would be happy if somebody can correct me and looking forward to recieve
> >any posivite answer.
|
|
|
| Re: Get involved !? - In what ? a not existing project? [message #11656 is a reply to message #11621] |
Thu, 11 December 2003 12:52 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: rsk.email.arizona.edu
Try myeclipse (www.myeclipseide.com) I found that to be what I was
looking for.
New version comes out today with new struts specific tools and improved
xml/jsp editing (I've been sitting on there hitting refresh for the past
hour :)
Berlitz wrote:
> Yes i understand. But when i am looking at the latest news (e.g. netbeans
> will not work together with Eclipse, bea offers an own IDE,...) i am not
> sure whether they get some of the big players on board.
>
> Regarding the lomboz plugin, it forces me to use a directory structure,
> which isn't that well organized.
>
> Tom wrote:
>
>
>>Your observations are correct to a certain extent. Very little
>>movement-action here currently.
>
>
>>According to some announcements in the past few weeks this is because
>>they are still attempting to get some of the big players on board.
>>Once that is complete the project should fire up.
>
>
>>In the meantime I'm using the Lomboz plugins for J2EE.
>
>
>
>>On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:45:07 +0000 (UTC), Berlitz@yahoo.com (Berlitz)
>>wrote:
>
>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>i read about the webtools project time ago, but i dont recognize any
>>>movement here. Different from the VE tools project, where a lot of
>>>movement is taken place, the webtools project seems to be dead.
>>>
>>>Please correct me if i am wrong, but it seems J2EE and eclipse will not
>>>come together.
>>>I would be happy if somebody can correct me and looking forward to recieve
>>>any posivite answer.
>
>
>
|
|
| | |
| Re: Get involved !? - In what ? a not existing project? [message #12181 is a reply to message #11621] |
Sat, 13 December 2003 02:35 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
> Regarding the lomboz plugin, it forces me to use a directory structure,
> which isn't that well organized.
that's exactly the same reason I don't use lomboz, besides it comes with
1000 function I'll use just one/two
>
> Tom wrote:
>
> > Your observations are correct to a certain extent. Very little
> > movement-action here currently.
>
> > According to some announcements in the past few weeks this is because
> > they are still attempting to get some of the big players on board.
> > Once that is complete the project should fire up.
>
> > In the meantime I'm using the Lomboz plugins for J2EE.
>
>
> > On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:45:07 +0000 (UTC), Berlitz@yahoo.com (Berlitz)
> > wrote:
>
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >i read about the webtools project time ago, but i dont recognize any
> > >movement here. Different from the VE tools project, where a lot of
> > >movement is taken place, the webtools project seems to be dead.
> > >
> > >Please correct me if i am wrong, but it seems J2EE and eclipse will not
> > >come together.
> > >I would be happy if somebody can correct me and looking forward to
recieve
> > >any posivite answer.
>
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.551 / Virus Database: 343 - Release Date: 11/12/2003
|
|
|
| Re: Get involved !? - In what ? a not existing project? [message #12216 is a reply to message #11549] |
Mon, 29 December 2003 16:27 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Berlitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i read about the webtools project time ago, but i dont recognize any
> movement here. Different from the VE tools project, where a lot of
> movement is taken place, the webtools project seems to be dead.
>
> Please correct me if i am wrong, but it seems J2EE and eclipse will not
> come together.
> I would be happy if somebody can correct me and looking forward to recieve
> any posivite answer.
>
Berlitz,
IBM is committed to contributing to this project but it seems that the
project is now a victim of the change from eclipse.org to eclipse
Foundation.
The PRC of eclipse.org feels that it is not appropriate to start this
project until the new legal entity, eclipse Foundation, is in place.
At IBM we are working under the assumption that this project will get
going, early in 2004 we hope. We are working on our code base to get it
ready to contribute.
This has been a very frustrating experience for everyone. Let's hope
that the new eclipse Foundation will be worth the wait.
-- Arthur
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 10 20:27:02 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05646 seconds |
Home