Handler activation [message #925202] |
Thu, 27 September 2012 09:44  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
In e3 we have the concept of activeWhen and enabledWhen for handlers. How does this translate to e4?
In e4 we have the "visible when" attribute in the application model. Does that translate to the old activeWhen expression?
Then there is the @CanExecute annotation for handlers. I guess this translates to enabledWhen?
This then also means that handlers must be instantiated to find out if they can be enabled, right? There is no lazy enabledWhen any more like we use to have with core expressions?
Thanks for clarifying,
Best regards,
Wim Jongman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Handler activation [message #1696402 is a reply to message #929732] |
Tue, 26 May 2015 06:02   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
as it seems, the support for activeWhen has been replaced by the context
of the respective handler (a nice solution). However, there is currently
no way activate a handler based on the curretn perspective. Am I missing
something? If not, I would open up a BR for that.
Best regards
Jonas
Am 01.10.2012 um 20:08 schrieb Brian de Alwis:
> With E3.x, the handlers were in a flat global namespace, and so the
> activeWhen expressions were to figure out the most specific handler for
> the current situation (e.g., active when the activePartId = xxx).
>
> With E4.x, handlers can be installed on parts, windows, as well as
> globally on the MApplication. Handler look up starts from the active
> part and proceeds upwards. So many of the uses for the activeWhen
> expressions disappeared.
>
> Personally, I'm not too saddened to see the disappearance of lazy
> instantiation -- it's caused my projects more trouble than it's saved.
> But I can see the usefulness of supporting enablement expressions: they
> allow reusing the same handler implementation in other circumstances.
>
> Brian.
--
Get professional Eclipse developer support:
http://eclipsesource.com/en/services/developer-support/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04822 seconds