|
|
Re: ProR support for Specifications Relation Groups [message #902206 is a reply to message #902039] |
Thu, 16 August 2012 11:21 |
|
Hi Kivanc,
Yup, this is a known issue, and it's difficult to fix, as it is actually an issue with the ReqIF schema. Fixing this the "right" way would break schema conformance, and we're still looking for a way to handle this graceful in the UI.
Just curious: What do you use Relation Groups for? Is it for DOORS-compatibility, or is there another reason to use them?
Best,
- Michael
|
|
|
|
Re: ProR support for Specifications Relation Groups [message #902438 is a reply to message #902231] |
Fri, 17 August 2012 15:04 |
|
Hi Kivanc,
Okay, I see what you're trying to do here. You're right, the SpecRelationsGroup is the only way to create a spec-to-spec link.
The underlying problem is a bug in the ReqIF schema, where the inheritance from SpecElement was accidentally omitted. This propagates through the UI, where a casting to SpecElement fails, even though it should be permitted according to the ReqIF spec (but not according to the ReqIF schema). If we allow this, the result will be invalid ReqIF (at least with respect to version 1.0.1).
Can you live without this for now, or is it crucial? I would prefer to leave this alone for now, but I understand that this is not a very satisfying answer.
Best,
- Michael
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03517 seconds