|
| Re: EMF dependencies in plain OSGi application [message #902019 is a reply to message #902002] |
Wed, 15 August 2012 14:05  |
 Ed Merks
Messages: 31038
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hauke,
You can look at https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=328227 for
some details. Repackaging is the simplest approach...
On 15/08/2012 2:58 PM, Hauke Fuhrmann wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> we want to use EMF in a plain OSGi application, where even equinox
> might be replaced by some other OSGi kernel (e.g. felix).
>
> By "use" I mean that we want to use the generated classes and saving
> and loading of resources.
>
> I understand the main requirements for EMF are
> * org.eclipse.emf.ecore
> * org.eclipse.emf.common
> * org.eclipse.emf.ecore.xmi if you want XMI support
>
> In a plain Java application it is sufficient to put those jar files
> into the classpath.
>
> However, in our OSGi context, EMF is also dependent on
> org.eclipse.runtine and this pulls in a whole bunch of Eclipse
> specific plugins, which we don't want to have, i.e.
>
> * org.eclipse.core.contenttype
> * org.eclipse.core.jobs
> * org.eclipse.core.runtime
> * org.eclipse.equinox.app
> * org.eclipse.equinox.common
> * org.eclipse.equinox.preferences
> * org.eclipse.equinox.registry
>
> Any way to use "plain EMF" in an OSGi context?
>
> As a workaround I could create a new bundle and put the three core EMF
> bundles into this plain bundle. Sounds like a bad hack.
> Any other best practices?
>
> Cheers,
> Hauke
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01905 seconds
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
