Juno with Batik 1.7 [message #898801] |
Fri, 27 July 2012 12:45  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I've tried updating my Eclipse project to use the Batik 1.7.0 bundles from the Orbit repository (R20120526062928), but after doing so my application will not launch:
!MESSAGE Missing required capability Require-Capability: osgi.ee; filter="(|(&(osgi.ee=CDC/Foundation)(version=1.0))(&(osgi.ee=JavaSE)(version=1.3)))".
!SUBENTRY 1 org.eclipse.osgi 2 0 2012-07-27 16:53:38.846
!MESSAGE Bundle initial@reference:file:plugins/org.eclipse.e4.ui.css.core_0.10.1.v20120523-1955.jar was not resolved.
!SUBENTRY 2 org.eclipse.e4.ui.css.core 2 0 2012-07-27 16:53:38.847
!MESSAGE Missing required bundle org.apache.batik.css_[1.6.0,1.7.0).
I've checked the target platform and the run configuration, and the org.apache.batik.css(1.7.0.v20100111041432) plugin is present and selected.
However, validating the plugins also reports that org.eclipse.e4.ui.css.core is missing the Required Bundle org.apache.batik.css.
Is it just me, or is Juno not compatible with batik from Orbit?
Any ideas on how to get Batik 1.7.0 in Juno?
In case your wondering, I need Batik 1.7.0 as Batik 1.6.0 throws an AbstractMethodError when trying to use DOM Level 3 (Core) methods (e.g. setUserData).
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Juno with Batik 1.7 [message #899302 is a reply to message #899271] |
Tue, 31 July 2012 08:17  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Batik 1.7.0 is in Orbit, so I assume those issues were resolved. I did briefly experiment with using Batik 1.7.0 a while back and didn't notice any issues. But it didn't fix a key issue from 1.6 that we faced with the E4 CSS (specifically vendor prefixes like '-swt-'), and it was late in the game to switch.
I'd suggest you bring in the org.eclipse.e4.ui.css.core bundle, modify it to relax the allowed versions, and give it a try. Report back on your experiences on:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=266174
If you need this for your own product, ship your fixed version css.core using a feature patch.
Brian.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.49058 seconds